Poll

Which is the better EC?

Nergalsharezer
30 (68.2%)
Nebushasban
14 (31.8%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Voting closed: April 06, 2012, 05:07:25 PM

Author Topic: Crimson: 2. Nergalsharezer vs. 7. Nebushasban  (Read 5478 times)

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Crimson: 2. Nergalsharezer vs. 7. Nebushasban
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2012, 02:08:52 PM »
0
And yes, swapping LS is nice, but I actually see players stopping the use of any LS they can't rescue, as the swapping with start to creep into meta.  Thus, an OT offense won't be using the NT-only as much (or they'll use FBTN LS).

OT offenses basically have to use the FBTN LS no matter what their deck is.

I would that agree with that statement entirely, but for the most part I would agree, I think if you have the exchanger + a bunch of soul gen + an alternative way to negate lost souls included in your deck I think you're ok to drop FBTN.   

Pretty much all OT offenses are also males.  Abigail, a few Genesis heroes, maybe Deborah or Jael?  I'm trying to think of others that would actually see use in a competitive deck.  That right there locks you out of 2 possible souls in your opponent's deck, 3 for your males with less than 4 defense.
Nebushasban can take care of that problem if FBTN was rescued.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal