Poll

Which is the better EC?

King Manasseh
37 (88.1%)
Jezebel
5 (11.9%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Voting closed: April 07, 2012, 01:35:06 PM

Author Topic: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel  (Read 5922 times)

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #25 on: April 03, 2012, 05:45:50 PM »
0
Defenses built around a single EC are terrible. This leads to dead draws more times than not. Manny's only silver lining is his auto-block and capability to carry Charms. Therefore he still fits better in the splash defense.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2012, 11:31:39 AM »
+1
I disagree with that to an extent.  A defense that uses Manny is already a decent defense without him.  Since it's probably either Kings of Judah or Magicians, adding Manny to them makes those defenses go from good to awesome. 

Similar to what TGT does for a TGT deck.  Or what AUTO does for a Sam deck.
...ellipses...

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2012, 01:59:25 PM »
0
I disagree with that to an extent.  A defense that uses Manny is already a decent defense without him.  Since it's probably either Kings of Judah or Magicians, adding Manny to them makes those defenses go from good to awesome. 

Similar to what TGT does for a TGT deck.  Or what AUTO does for a Sam deck.

Those examples are way too extreme, especially since Manny is actually one of the weaker magicians without Gates behind him (at which point, you're playing a Judean/Magicians defense, not a Magicians defense). I would say that Manny is to Kings of Judah what Salome is to TGT, or maybe even Mary, Mother of James is to TGT. Useful, but not the lynchpin.

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #28 on: April 04, 2012, 02:15:28 PM »
0
You're right, I think your examples are better.

I still think though, that the argument I made refutes MKC's statement that a Manny defense is terrible without Manny. 
...ellipses...

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2012, 02:16:29 PM »
0
I disagree with that to an extent.  A defense that uses Manny is already a decent defense without him.  Since it's probably either Kings of Judah or Magicians, adding Manny to them makes those defenses go from good to awesome. 

Similar to what TGT does for a TGT deck.  Or what AUTO does for a Sam deck.

Those examples are way too extreme, especially since Manny is actually one of the weaker magicians without Gates behind him (at which point, you're playing a Judean/Magicians defense, not a Magicians defense). I would say that Manny is to Kings of Judah what Salome is to TGT, or maybe even Mary, Mother of James is to TGT. Useful, but not the lynchpin.
Judean defenses don't exist. A brown defense would have Gomer, Uzzah, King Mannaseh, and Jeering Youths (extra play first). Then you have the magician part (likely Damsel, Egyptian Magicians, Assyrian Survivor, and Assyrian Siege Army), which will probably include SWS, Wandering Spirit, Spirit of Temptation, and KoT.

Yeah, it's a big defense, but look at those characters. Awesome. Plus you get 3 end the battles (for best effect, use Manny) and 2 soul shufflers.

However, I agree that Manny is more like an MMOJ than a TGT.

Instaposted.

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2012, 02:26:10 PM »
0
I disagree with your statement that Judean Defenses don't exist.  Manny, Rehoboam, Ammon, and Zedekiah.  Are all good characters for a a Judean kings defense.  Manny is well Manny, Rehoboam is the lynchpin for some seriously awesome combos, Ammon has great recursion, and Dungeon + Zed wins battles and gets you a soul.  Throw in Uzzah, TAS, Gomer, KoT and Damsel.  And you have a good brown (mostly kings of Judah) defense with KoT, and Damsel being the only oddballs.
...ellipses...

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2012, 02:27:01 PM »
+1
I disagree with that to an extent.  A defense that uses Manny is already a decent defense without him.  Since it's probably either Kings of Judah or Magicians, adding Manny to them makes those defenses go from good to awesome. 

Similar to what TGT does for a TGT deck.  Or what AUTO does for a Sam deck.

Those examples are way too extreme, especially since Manny is actually one of the weaker magicians without Gates behind him (at which point, you're playing a Judean/Magicians defense, not a Magicians defense). I would say that Manny is to Kings of Judah what Salome is to TGT, or maybe even Mary, Mother of James is to TGT. Useful, but not the lynchpin.
Judean defenses don't exist. A brown defense would have Gomer, Uzzah, King Mannaseh, and Jeering Youths (extra play first). Then you have the magician part (likely Damsel, Egyptian Magicians, Assyrian Survivor, and Assyrian Siege Army), which will probably include SWS, Wandering Spirit, Spirit of Temptation, and KoT.

No Rehoboam? For shame! Also, I'm not sure I'd include ASA with only Survivor to complement it; I'd be more likely to include another magicians (probably Astrologers).

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #32 on: April 04, 2012, 02:38:12 PM »
0
No Rehoboam? For shame! Also, I'm not sure I'd include ASA with only Survivor to complement it; I'd be more likely to include another magicians (probably Astrologers).
Depends on the offense. I'm not a huge fan of Rehoboam just because he tends to give initiative away.

I go back and forth on ASA, but my most recent version had him (though it was entirely untested). I do like Astrologers though.

I disagree with your statement that Judean Defenses don't exist.  Manny, Rehoboam, Ammon, and Zedekiah.  Are all good characters for a a Judean kings defense.  Manny is well Manny, Rehoboam is the lynchpin for some seriously awesome combos, Ammon has great recursion, and Dungeon + Zed wins battles and gets you a soul.  Throw in Uzzah, TAS, Gomer, KoT and Damsel.  And you have a good brown (mostly kings of Judah) defense with KoT, and Damsel being the only oddballs.
Amon needs Manny in the discard pile, and that hopefully won't happen. There are definitely better options.

KoT and Damsel really wouldn't be oddballs though with Magic Charms Gomer/Manny. Manny's full potential is utilized by PG though.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2012, 02:58:42 PM »
+1
No Rehoboam? For shame! Also, I'm not sure I'd include ASA with only Survivor to complement it; I'd be more likely to include another magicians (probably Astrologers).
Depends on the offense. I'm not a huge fan of Rehoboam just because he tends to give initiative away.

I go back and forth on ASA, but my most recent version had him (though it was entirely untested). I do like Astrologers though.

I just think that, if you're already using Gates of Jerusalem, you may as well add Rehoboam, since he has a great ability (that becomes CBN), and allows you to either kill your opponent's hero or otherwise use your own hero's ability. I wouldn't just splash him into a brown deck, but if you're using GoJ, why not?

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Multi: 1. King Manasseh vs. 8. Jezebel
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2012, 03:04:50 PM »
0
There's no reason to not to include him, or at least that's my conclusion.  He's an extra D1 with gates, he can get rid of a hero, or use some amazing combos like pulling off Hur + Gifts mid-block to draw cards and disrupt his hand.  Or get someone like  Micah into battle to do his recursion without having to make a rescue with him.  Maybe you put your inish prophet in the battle so you can play search and get out CM or Grapes to get the block.  The possibilities are almost endless...
...ellipses...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal