Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Unofficial Tournaments => Playgroup and Tournament Central => Redemption March Madness => Topic started by: Professoralstad on April 17, 2012, 03:06:15 PM

Title: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Professoralstad on April 17, 2012, 03:06:15 PM
Who is the better EC?
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Wings of Music on April 17, 2012, 03:07:44 PM
Kot does a lot of what Goliath does, but better.  The only real thing Goliath has over Kot is withdraw soul manipulation.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Red Wing on April 17, 2012, 03:13:24 PM
The only real thing Goliath has over Kot is withdraw soul manipulation.
Goliath is recur-able.

This is a pretty tough vote, but I guess I'll go with KoT.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Wings of Music on April 17, 2012, 03:15:13 PM
True, I didn't think about that.  I still think I'll go with KoT though since phillies are a relatively weak defense.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 17, 2012, 04:39:16 PM
They both do pretty similar things, and have pretty identical uses (early game dominance and forcing your opponent to think differently when they know you have them). I happen to think that KoT does both of these things better than Goliath, so he gets my vote, despite Goliath's recursion.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Redoubter on April 17, 2012, 07:24:18 PM
KoT doesn't do everything better than Goliath.  Goliath not only punts (which is not better than some EC he beat to get here as I argued, but it's better than a bland negate), but everything he does is CBN.  He may die easily, but KoT dies easier.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: lp670sv on April 17, 2012, 07:28:12 PM
You guys aren't seeing the neat combo that involves Goliath, Herod Agrippa II and capturing your opponents entire offense  8)
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 17, 2012, 08:18:26 PM
KoT doesn't do everything better than Goliath.  Goliath not only punts (which is not better than some EC he beat to get here as I argued, but it's better than a bland negate), but everything he does is CBN.  He may die easily, but KoT dies easier.

This is simply not true. Goliath punts, but King of Tyrus also negates everything that Goliath negates, and more. Goliath's CBN status hasn't (in my experience) been much of an issue aside from the kick being CBN. KoT quite simply does not die easier, because KoT is vulnerable to less things than Goliath is (read: every single non-CBN good enhancement). Just because a negate is "bland" doesn't mean anything, especially since Philistines get steamrolled by virtually every OT offense available right now, especially red and Sam decks.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Redoubter on April 17, 2012, 08:23:41 PM
read: every single non-CBN good enhancement

Oh, so you use non-CBN good enhancements as the mainstay in your competitive decks?

You're doing it wrong :P
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 17, 2012, 08:26:14 PM
read: every single non-CBN good enhancement

Oh, so you use non-CBN good enhancements as the mainstay in your competitive decks?

You're doing it wrong :P

TGT and Gardensciples players do it, red and gold players, if not using Sam decks, will need negateable enhancements or risk not having enough oomph to win, Disciples uses a lot of negateable enhancements unless played on Thomas, etc. etc. All of these themes are perfectly viable and are doing it right.

Don't even get me started on how quickly any number of red heroes kill Goliath.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Redoubter on April 17, 2012, 08:30:52 PM
Don't even get me started on how quickly any number of red heroes kill Goliath.

Or how quickly they kill KoT?  ::)

Deb's Directive, Ehud's Dagger, Sam's Edict, Ambush the City, Sword Against Sword, Samson's Sacrifice (numbers) all work for Gold.

And seriously, how often do we talk about how all the discards for Red are CBN because of David or CBN because of Uriah?
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 17, 2012, 08:37:06 PM
Don't even get me started on how quickly any number of red heroes kill Goliath.

Or how quickly they kill KoT?  ::)

Deb's Directive, Ehud's Dagger, Sam's Edict, Ambush the City, Sword Against Sword, Samson's Sacrifice (numbers) all work for Gold.

And seriously, how often do we talk about how all the discards for Red are CBN because of David or CBN because of Uriah?

I'm talking about Goliath simply being left open with pretty much no defense. If he's in territory, Asahel + Bravery makes quick work of him. If he pushes someone out, bring in Ahimelek. I'm not saying that King of Tyrus isn't vulnerable to a lot of things, I'm just saying that Goliath is even more vulnerable. Both evil characters excel in the early game, but I think King of Tyrus has more lasting power.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Master KChief on April 18, 2012, 08:52:48 AM
Goliath has the recursion power to keep coming back. He's also a plus everytime Outpost is used. Goliath gets my vote for that.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Warrior_Monk on April 18, 2012, 09:12:36 AM
Goliath is useless with all the Ahimileks running around.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Arrthoa on April 18, 2012, 09:48:52 AM
Goliath is better than KoT and that's all I need to say. :P
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 18, 2012, 11:30:32 AM
Goliath has the recursion power to keep coming back. He's also a plus everytime Outpost is used. Goliath gets my vote for that.

Unless you get it in the first couple turns, Outpost is pretty useless. Having a block every turn doesn't mean anything if you can't back it up, and against most offenses, Outpost writes a check that it's characters can't cash.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Minister Polarius on April 18, 2012, 04:47:39 PM
KoT all the way. Goliath is nice, but he just doesn't have anything backing him up. Gold KoT pretty much does what Goliath does, but also has Evil Spirit and Wonders Forgotten.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Wings of Music on April 18, 2012, 05:07:45 PM
To be at his best Goliath has to be in a Philly defense, which is not a very good defense.

To be as his best KoT just has to be put in pretty much any defense, which can often be some really good defenses.

So KoT should win based on versatility.   
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Master KChief on April 18, 2012, 07:59:57 PM
Goliath has the recursion power to keep coming back. He's also a plus everytime Outpost is used. Goliath gets my vote for that.

Unless you get it in the first couple turns, Outpost is pretty useless. Having a block every turn doesn't mean anything if you can't back it up, and against most offenses, Outpost writes a check that it's characters can't cash.

You don't have to get it the first couple of turns to use it, it's only optimal if you do. Outpost can squeeze every last drop out of your deck searching/recurring EC's, then sac itself to bring something back one last time. There is never a time Outpost is 'useless'. Having big numbers and above average abilities is enough to minus your opponent, even if you have nothing to go with them. Philistines also have some good support with Foolish Advise, Bringing Fear + whatever battle winner, or even Bringing Fear alone. As noted, Goliath is hurt by the increased usage of Ahimilek, but that shouldn't be a worry even half the time.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 18, 2012, 08:30:10 PM
Goliath has the recursion power to keep coming back. He's also a plus everytime Outpost is used. Goliath gets my vote for that.

Unless you get it in the first couple turns, Outpost is pretty useless. Having a block every turn doesn't mean anything if you can't back it up, and against most offenses, Outpost writes a check that it's characters can't cash.

You don't have to get it the first couple of turns to use it, it's only optimal if you do. Outpost can squeeze every last drop out of your deck searching/recurring EC's, then sac itself to bring something back one last time. There is never a time Outpost is 'useless'. Having big numbers and above average abilities is enough to minus your opponent, even if you have nothing to go with them. Philistines also have some good support with Foolish Advise, Bringing Fear + whatever battle winner, or even Bringing Fear alone. As noted, Goliath is hurt by the increased usage of Ahimilek, but that shouldn't be a worry even half the time.

The problem is that Phillies require at least a five card commitment, and that's without enhancements. The other problem is that, right now, virtually every already viable offense in the game stomps them. Phillies no longer use anti-purple tech aside from , which makes them vulnerable to Disciples and Gardensciples. They have a bit of an advantage over all other defenses but demons against TGT, and even then, it's not much of one. Genesis has two CBN characters, so pretty much every Philly evil character is just handing them initiative. Ahimelek is far from being the only thing red and Sam decks have against Phillies: Asahel, David, Foreign Sword, CBN banding (for Sam), etc. all stomps Phillies quite effectively. This is one where I'm voting partially out of theme: Phillies are bad, and Goliath is only good if used in a Phillies deck. King of Tyrus does pretty much everything Goliath does and more, except of course for the withdraw, which in my opinion, just gives your opponent a chance to set up something brutal.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Master KChief on April 18, 2012, 10:28:48 PM
The problem is that Phillies require at least a five card commitment, and that's without enhancements.

Not true. And if it were, how exactly is that a 'problem'?

Quote
The other problem is that, right now, virtually every already viable offense in the game stomps them.

Virtually every offense in the game stomps KoT. It's a wash.

Quote
They have a bit of an advantage over all other defenses but demons against TGT, and even then, it's not much of one.

So wait...generating EC's so you can actually block TGT isn't 'much of an advantage'? Sorry, but that's the biggest and most versatile advantage against TGT.

Quote
Genesis has two CBN characters, so pretty much every Philly evil character is just handing them initiative.

Genesis isn't T1 so Goliath doesn't care. Also, Asherah/Horses/JIP say hi. GG.

Quote
Ahimelek is far from being the only thing red and Sam decks have against Phillies: Asahel, David, Foreign Sword, CBN banding (for Sam), etc. all stomps Phillies quite effectively.

What exactly does CBN banding do against Goliath? Banding is the biggest thing Goliath takes poops on.

Quote
This is one where I'm voting partially out of theme: Phillies are bad, and Goliath is only good if used in a Phillies deck.

SomeKittens piloted a meta-defense with Philly splash at last years Nats quite effectively. It works.

Quote
King of Tyrus does pretty much everything Goliath does and more except of course for the withdraw, which in my opinion, just gives your opponent a chance to set up something brutal.

Only against Red, nothing more. Every other matchup, he keeps coming back. Phillistines accomplish something KoT never will: mind games. Long story short, both get roflstomped easily in todays meta. Not really a fan of either. But only Goliath has the advantage of the tutor (pluses for days), recursion, and mind games, and for that he gets my vote.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 18, 2012, 10:37:02 PM
Not true. And if it were, how exactly is that a 'problem'?

Five cards is a lot since Phillies are only good at the beginning.

Quote
Virtually every offense in the game stomps KoT. It's a wash.

Again, Goliath is vulnerable to non-CBN enhancements, of which there are a few. KoT is not. Point KoT.

Quote
So wait...generating EC's so you can actually block TGT isn't 'much of an advantage'? Sorry, but that's the biggest and most versatile advantage against TGT.

Not when the amount of evil characters is relatively small. You have to have one in territory for Outpost to make a difference, and that leaves him vulnerable to Grail, Angel of the Lord, Meeting the Messiah, etc. It is an advantage, but TGT still has no problems with Phillies.

Quote
Genesis isn't T1 so Goliath doesn't care. Also, Asherah/Horses/JIP say hi. GG.

Genesis is most definitely T1, especially with all the soul gen it has. JiP is the one good card against Genesis, and that only makes a big impact with Creation of the World.

Quote
What exactly does CBN banding do against Goliath? Banding is the biggest thing Goliath takes poops on.

Numbers. Samuel bands to David, Goliath plays an easily negated enhancement. GG.

Quote
SomeKittens piloted a meta-defense with Philly splash at last years Nats quite effectively. It works.

Phillies were the best or second best defense last year. They're not this year. Moot point.

Quote
Only against Red, nothing more. Every other matchup, he keeps coming back. Phillistines accomplish something KoT never will: mind games. Long story short, both get roflstomped easily in todays meta. Not really a fan of either. But only Goliath has the advantage of the tutor (pluses for days), recursion, and mind games, and for that he gets my vote.

King of Tyrus on his own uses mind games as effectively as Goliath on his own does, and again, it allows your opponent to set up the rescue as he sees fit.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Warrior_Monk on April 18, 2012, 10:52:58 PM
Chronic just brought up another big point. 75% (completely made up statistic) of decks use David, which makes Goliath worthless.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Master KChief on April 18, 2012, 10:59:55 PM
Five cards is a lot since Phillies are only good at the beginning.

5 cards are nothing when they are all tutored out easily. And as stated, Phillies do not need 5 cards committed to the theme to use them effectively.

Quote
Again, Goliath is vulnerable to non-CBN enhancements, of which there are a few. KoT is not. Point KoT.

The 'few' is completely negligible. There are a handful of ways in each T1 offense to steamroll both Kot and Goliath. Non-CBN enhancements don't matter at all except against RLK's, which you will win the game anyway.

Quote
Not when the amount of evil characters is relatively small. You have to have one in territory for Outpost to make a difference, and that leaves him vulnerable to Grail, Angel of the Lord, Meeting the Messiah, etc. It is an advantage, but TGT still has no problems with Phillies.

It doesn't make as much of an impact as mono-orange, but it still makes a difference and has far better chances at blocking TGT than meta defenses ever will.

Quote
Genesis is most definitely T1, especially with all the soul gen it has.

Genesis was overrated out the gate, and many realized that when it still couldn't stay paced with Sam/TGT/Disciples. The slight advantage gained from the soul gen certainly does not bump them up a tier.

Quote
JiP is the one good card against Genesis, and that only makes a big impact with Creation of the World.

So GG?

Quote
Numbers. Samuel bands to David, Goliath plays an easily negated enhancement. GG.

Talking about pre-withdraw. CBN banding will do zilch against Goliath. Your only hope is to lead with a weak lineup hoping for the Goliath drop, but bluffing with weak Heroes aren't exactly hard to get over with other splash EC's.


Quote
Phillies were the best or second best defense last year. They're not this year. Moot point.

The inclusion of Red in the T1 meta does not invalidate how strong Phillistines are. The odds are in favor of a Philly player if strictly speaking against the T1 meta. The odds are even greater if Genesis is included at T1. ::)

Quote
King of Tyrus on his own uses mind games as effectively as Goliath on his own does, and again, it allows your opponent to set up the rescue as he sees fit.

Lolwut? How does KoT possibly play mindgames? He blocks, he gets lucky if early game or he dies. Never comes back. Never forces you to rethink how to attempt a rescue. There are absolutely zero mind games there. Just a big beater ready to get steamrolled.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Chronic Apathy on April 18, 2012, 11:14:11 PM
5 cards are nothing when they are all tutored out easily. And as stated, Phillies do not need 5 cards committed to the theme to use them effectively.

You're forgetting that they still need to have Outpost out to be effective at all. If it's buried and you haven't added a few cards that can pull an evil fort, they're even less useful than normal.

Quote
The 'few' is completely negligible. There are a handful of ways in each T1 offense to steamroll both Kot and Goliath. Non-CBN enhancements don't matter at all except against RLK's, which you will win the game anyway.

The 'few' matters when playing TGT. It's not a big deal really, however, it helps lessen that gap between Phillies and everything else (though it doesn't come to close to closing it). It also matters in isolated non-RLK incidents, and it's a big enough deal to worth noting in my opinion.

Quote
It doesn't make as much of an impact as mono-orange, but it still makes a difference and has far better chances at blocking TGT than meta defenses ever will.

I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm just saying that the difference isn't too huge a deal.

Quote
Genesis was overrated out the gate, and many realized that when it still couldn't stay paced with Sam/TGT/Disciples. The slight advantage gained from the soul gen certainly does not bump them up a tier.

Genesis is not the power player people thought it was, but it's still going to make a presence in the meta, especially if non-meta defenses end up making any kind of an impact during the season, since Genesis does best against them, at least in my opinion.

Quote
So GG?

I hardly think one possible card being played against another card is "GG". I played Genesis for roughly 50-60 games, give or take, and only got JiP'd after a Creation of the World once (and I still won that game).

Quote
Talking about pre-withdraw. CBN banding will do zilch against Goliath. Your only hope is to lead with a weak lineup hoping for the Goliath drop, but bluffing with weak Heroes aren't exactly hard to get over with other splash EC's.

Good decks don't need to run with weak lineups after the first couple rounds.

Quote
The inclusion of Red in the T1 meta does not invalidate how strong Phillistines are. The odds are in favor of a Philly player if strictly speaking against the T1 meta. The odds are even greater if Genesis is included at T1. ::)

The only reason Phillies got a lot of use at last year's Nats was because of Goliath and because of the anti-purple tech. With Goliath not being as strong as he was against new heroes (red or otherwise), and Purple no longer dominating the meta, Phillies lost their luster.

Quote
Lolwut? How does KoT possibly play mindgames? He blocks, he gets lucky if early game or he dies. Never comes back. Never forces you to rethink how to attempt a rescue. There are absolutely zero mind games there. Just a big beater ready to get steamrolled.

A KoT in territory has the exact same effect a Goliath has in territory. There are zero other mind-games Phillies can play, considering they all do pretty much the same thing.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Master KChief on April 18, 2012, 11:34:54 PM
You're forgetting that they still need to have Outpost out to be effective at all. If it's buried and you haven't added a few cards that can pull an evil fort, they're even less useful than normal.

Everything is easily tutored/recurred between 2 cards. The unlikely chance Outpost is buried also does not mean it is a great card late game, because it is.

Quote
It also matters in isolated non-RLK incidents, and it's a big enough deal to worth noting in my opinion.

I'm sorry, I just wanted to make sure I saw 'isolated' and 'big enough deal' in the same sentence. That's pretty much an oxymoron. :P

Quote
I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm just saying that the difference isn't too huge a deal.

Any tech more viable than most the counters in the meta against TGT is a huge point in my book.

Quote
Genesis is not the power player people thought it was, but it's still going to make a presence in the meta, especially if non-meta defenses end up making any kind of an impact during the season, since Genesis does best against them, at least in my opinion.

Not disputing its presence, only that it doesn't have as much power/speed/consistency as Sam/TGT/Disciples.

Quote
I hardly think one possible card being played against another card is "GG". I played Genesis for roughly 50-60 games, give or take, and only got JiP'd after a Creation of the World once (and I still won that game).

JiP after Creation most times than not equals GG.

Quote
Talking about pre-withdraw. CBN banding will do zilch against Goliath. Your only hope is to lead with a weak lineup hoping for the Goliath drop, but bluffing with weak Heroes aren't exactly hard to get over with other splash EC's.

Not weak per-se, but a less than optimal lineup/bluff.

Quote
The only reason Phillies got a lot of use at last year's Nats was because of Goliath and because of the anti-purple tech. With Goliath not being as strong as he was against new heroes (red or otherwise), and Purple no longer dominating the meta, Phillies lost their luster.

Curious to know what the 'otherwise' is, as Red is Phillies hardest matchup.

Quote
A KoT in territory has the exact same effect a Goliath has in territory. There are zero other mind-games Phillies can play, considering they all do pretty much the same thing.

Not even remotely true. Anyone sees a KoT in territory, they make a rescue based on the fact they can easily get over that KoT. Nothing more, zero mind games. The knowledge of a matchup against Phillies, however, makes you second guess rescue attempts and decide over what to lead with over fear of a Goliath being dropped. Huge difference.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Warrior_Monk on April 18, 2012, 11:39:48 PM
Quote
A KoT in territory has the exact same effect a Goliath has in territory. There are zero other mind-games Phillies can play, considering they all do pretty much the same thing.

Not even remotely true. Anyone sees a KoT in territory, they make a rescue based on the fact they can easily get over that KoT. Nothing more, zero mind games. The knowledge of a matchup against Phillies, however, makes you second guess rescue attempts and decide over what to lead with over fear of a Goliath being dropped. Huge difference.
And then you gave your opponent initiative to nuke your territory and protect souls from rescue. GG.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on April 19, 2012, 12:07:34 AM
Pro-Tip.

Don't block Goliath against a non-Lydia character when playing Water Garden.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Warrior_Monk on April 19, 2012, 12:13:18 AM
Pro-Tip.

Don't block Goliath against a non-Lydia character when playing Water Garden.
Especially when you have a Charms up.

Now everybody understands my vendetta against Goliath. Had I had a KoT band in that situation, I would have been golden.
Title: Re: Elite Eight: 1. King of Tyrus vs. 1. Goliath
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on April 19, 2012, 12:19:55 AM
Yeah - Gomer would have helped. It was a pretty nasty set-up, I'll give it that.

KoT+Goliath+Dude holding charms=pretty nasty...
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal