Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Okay, you guys are all correct and I and the entire history of the game are wrong. You officially never have an opponent unless two players have characters in the Field of Battle. Have fun with that.
postcount.add(1);
actually i will post again. i was not refering to red. i was talking about the players as a rule being rude to the people who deserve more respect.
Quote from: I AM DANIEL on December 11, 2010, 04:32:23 PMactually i will post again. i was not refering to red. i was talking about the players as a rule being rude to the people who deserve more respect. No one was being rude, you have to understand that every Redemption discussion happens withing the context of the game and therefore should only be looked at within the context of the game. Intelligent people like pol, sauce, raith, and Schaef etc get into arguments over rules and semantics because they are intuitive. Naturally their minds are opposed to inconsistency and in tune with logic and reason. Therefore they do everything in their power to try and fix these inconsistencies. The controversy arises when people have different oppnions of what is right and wrong. Now sometimes (and in this case as well), because of the impersonal median that is the computer, discussions such as these are misunderstood by those looking in and are inevitably labeled as flame wars. So rather than saying that people are rude blame it on Al Gore.
i didn't want to get involved but now i am. Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 11, 2010, 05:02:33 PMQuote from: I AM DANIEL on December 11, 2010, 04:32:23 PMactually i will post again. i was not refering to red. i was talking about the players as a rule being rude to the people who deserve more respect. No one was being rude, you have to understand that every Redemption discussion happens withing the context of the game and therefore should only be looked at within the context of the game. Intelligent people like pol, sauce, raith, and Schaef etc get into arguments over rules and semantics because they are intuitive. Naturally their minds are opposed to inconsistency and in tune with logic and reason. Therefore they do everything in their power to try and fix these inconsistencies. The controversy arises when people have different oppnions of what is right and wrong. Now sometimes (and in this case as well), because of the impersonal median that is the computer, discussions such as these are misunderstood by those looking in and are inevitably labeled as flame wars. So rather than saying that people are rude blame it on Al Gore.this is an classic example of somebody taking something i said out of context. in order to see every single meaning i have in my posts you have to read all my other posts in the thread. (i have to learn to be more clear) with this said, i was refrencing how frustrated people are with the reg and how tired i am of seeing the same old comments over and over again.
