Author Topic: Priests deck question  (Read 3958 times)

Offline TDK

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 320
  • Planet of the Apes
Priests deck question
« on: April 11, 2010, 10:51:54 AM »
0
Would Glory of the Lord protect Z'Temple?

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2010, 11:07:23 AM »
0
Nothing on ZT or Glory of the Lord says anything about that working...However, people were trying to rule that ZT, ST, HT and The Tabernacle are all the same unique fortress...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline TDK

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 320
  • Planet of the Apes
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2010, 07:40:44 PM »
0
Nothing on ZT or Glory of the Lord says anything about that working...However, people were trying to rule that ZT, ST, HT and The Tabernacle are all the same unique fortress...
i think it would make sense if it did protect it

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2010, 09:50:55 PM »
0
Nothing on ZT or Glory of the Lord says anything about that working...However, people were trying to rule that ZT, ST, HT and The Tabernacle are all the same unique fortress...
i think it would make sense if it did protect it
It would make sense, but so would ruling that captured demons can't be redeemed. :)
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2010, 11:14:35 PM »
0
Nothing on ZT or Glory of the Lord says anything about that working...However, people were trying to rule that ZT, ST, HT and The Tabernacle are all the same unique fortress...
i think it would make sense if it did protect it
It would make sense, but so would ruling that captured demons can't be redeemed. :)


uh-oh. I sense epic spam...  :o
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2010, 03:57:13 AM »
0
It wouldn't even make sense. The Glory of the Lord departed the original temple before it was destroyed, then the temple was destroyed, then the temple was rebuilt, but the Glory of the Lord never came back. That's why they didn't make it say something like The Tabernacle.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2010, 09:57:57 AM »
0
 +1

The GotL never appeared in ZT or HT.  I also Disagree that ST, HT, ZT, and the Tabernacle are all the same unique fortress.  That would not even make sense.
In AMERICA!!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2010, 10:13:34 AM »
0
More sense than being able to have them in play at the same time?
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2010, 10:04:58 AM »
0
Quote
More sense than being able to have them in play at the same time?

I thought that was put on the card to keep combo's in check.  I was never under the impression that they were considered the same unique fortress.
In AMERICA!!

12tipton3

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2010, 01:32:18 AM »
0
look in the bible, they are not the same meeting place.

(Here are the original meeting places in chronological order! ;D)


1. Tabernacle: was a movable tent that housed the ark of the covenant and was a place of sacrifice and worship while the israelites were concouring the holy land.

2. Solomon's Temple: David wanted to build the temple but GOD said no because he was a man of war. GOD choose solomon to build the temple. solomon was the son of bathsheeba so GOD had a purpose after David sinned. anyway, solomon built a permenant place of worship till it was destroyed and ransaked by the babylonians.
(which didn't turn out well for the babs considering their leader {belshazzar} drank from the temple goblets and ended up dead.  :o)

3. Zerubabel's Temple: Haggai and Zerubabel were ready to re-build the temple after the exile (or return) from babylon. Haggai was the prophet and Zerubabel was a faithful worker for GOD. they rebuilt the temple and in doing so made one of the most awesomest cards in redemption history! (i love this card!!!! ;D)

well. that's about it! enjoy! ;)

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2010, 08:09:36 AM »
0
1. Tabernacle...

2. Solomon's Temple...

3. Zerubabel's Temple...
You be forgetting of the temple of Mr. Herod.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2010, 11:28:49 AM »
0
That was the same as Z-Temple, just upgraded.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2010, 01:07:43 PM »
0
That was the same as Z-Temple, just upgraded.
Shouldn't they be considered the same unique fortress then?
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #13 on: April 17, 2010, 03:42:40 PM »
0
If Herod's Temple was a fortress I'd agree with you :)
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #14 on: April 17, 2010, 03:47:41 PM »
0
If Herod's Temple was a fortress I'd agree with you :)

Well, it could be someday. So it might be a question worth asking.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Priests deck question
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2010, 03:56:27 PM »
0
Nah, So many other better cards to print first. The playtesters would be silly to print another temple just for the sake of having it be biblically acurate.
www.covenantgames.com

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal