« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game  (Read 6793 times)

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2010, 11:51:23 PM »
0
oooh.  That makes sense.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #26 on: September 18, 2010, 12:07:58 AM »
0
Quote from: Ring Wraith on September 17, 2010, 11:34:29 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 17, 2010, 11:25:43 PM
Quote from: SomeKittens on September 17, 2010, 11:09:34 PM
Also: Doesn't DON interrupt?
No dominant interrupts.
true. DoN negates, which is equivalent to an interrupt. however, it only does this after it's discarded, so the artifact doesn't continue through the phase.
Fix'd. Equivalent =/= the same as.
Logged

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #27 on: September 18, 2010, 12:20:41 AM »
0
half true. :P
Logged

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2010, 12:22:00 AM »
+1
Quote from: Ring Wraith on September 18, 2010, 12:20:41 AM
half true. :P
I only mention it because there apparently is a distinction between negate and interrupt/prevent. I don't really understand what that is, but it exists and has affected rulings in the past. I don't mean to be disagreeable.
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #29 on: September 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM »
0
News to me.  I've always thought that Negate, by definition, was "interrupt and prevent".

The more I learn about this game, the harder it gets to teach.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #30 on: September 18, 2010, 12:32:27 AM »
0
Quote from: SomeKittens on September 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
News to me.  I've always thought that Negate, by definition, was "interrupt and prevent".
That's how it used to be, apparently it's not anymore.
Logged

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #31 on: September 18, 2010, 07:19:39 AM »
0
im pretty sure 'negate' is being defined a bit differently in the new reg, something along the lines of 'cancel'.
Logged
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #32 on: September 18, 2010, 09:40:34 AM »
0
Quote from: SomeKittens on September 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
News to me.  I've always thought that Negate, by definition, was "interrupt and prevent".

The more I learn about this game, the harder it gets to teach.
I believe interrupt + prevent=negate, but negate =/= interrupt + prevent.
Logged

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
Re: Order on how things can be played at the start of the game
« Reply #33 on: September 18, 2010, 10:34:11 AM »
0
Quote from: Ring Wraith on September 18, 2010, 09:40:34 AM
Quote from: SomeKittens on September 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
News to me.  I've always thought that Negate, by definition, was "interrupt and prevent".

The more I learn about this game, the harder it gets to teach.
I believe interrupt + prevent=negate, but negate =/= interrupt + prevent.

I believe, my good sir, that you are correct. Though why the converse is true and the inverse isn't is beyond me...
Logged
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal