Author Topic: Plagued with Diseases Cumulative?  (Read 7181 times)

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Plagued with Diseases Cumulative?
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2009, 04:15:38 PM »
0
I've been ruling that Grapes does not allow an additional attempt by a player who has the most, including a tie for the most.

Sorry, but this seems to contradict what Cameron just said.  At the start of the game, zero to zero, are we tied for the most and thus no new rescue attempt, or are we tied for the least, or neither?  Am I the only person that has tried to play this card the first turn of the game?

Thanks again for clarifying this, because we are having another tournament this weekend.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Plagued with Diseases Cumulative?
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2009, 04:33:53 PM »
0
That quote from Bryon was from before the ruling on GoW was made I believe. Cameron is correct; "most" excludes ties.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Plagued with Diseases Cumulative?
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2009, 08:19:07 PM »
0
If no one has more than you, then you have the most.  Right?
That goes both ways. If no one has less than you, you don't have the most, right? I always thought of it ruling the other way.
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal