« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Highest numbers  (Read 4961 times)

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Highest numbers
« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2011, 10:10:50 PM »
0
It's Esther, according to the REG. =)
Logged

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Highest numbers
« Reply #26 on: December 15, 2011, 10:15:53 PM »
0

Considering the Matthew ruling, you can't recur it with King Nadab.

EDIT: Actually, the REG has been updated for AOCP claiming it has no reference. The REG did list the reference when the ruling was made, right?
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Highest numbers
« Reply #27 on: December 15, 2011, 10:39:53 PM »
0
Yup.  Therefore, no reference = no reference, no matter what the REG says.

It's probably going to get re-ruled with some "If it actually has words from the Bible, that's the reference" reasoning.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Highest numbers
« Reply #28 on: December 16, 2011, 01:16:07 AM »
0
Well it's almost certainly a misprint - albeit a wide-spread one.
Logged

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Highest numbers
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2011, 04:24:09 PM »
0
Esther 3:13

and i cant wait to see how this plays out...
Logged
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal