Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
because there has to be some people that complain about not having it.
Quote from: Master KChief on July 09, 2011, 05:58:21 PMbecause there has to be some people that complain about not having it. When I was 9 years old, my father told me the secret to being successful. He told me to pick one thing in life and try to do it better than anybody else.I picked complaining.
Quote from: Smokey on July 09, 2011, 05:15:12 PM1. How do you know there isn't a low number bab in the new set?2. There are confirmations of lots of new Disciples / Thadd counters in the new set.3. Drawing is OP regardless, and that won't change.I think it's really funny when people try to place spoiled new cards into the current metagame and don't consider the possibility of what other new cards exsist.1. There's only one Bab, and he does jack squat with this card up2. I know there are Thad counters, that's why I didn't mention him 3. That's exactly my point, giving Disciples the ability to nuke an opponents entire defense and shut down their (non-disciple) drawing at the cost of Thad is a very favorable tradeI think it's really funny when people act all smug and don't consider the possibility that other people have set lists too
1. How do you know there isn't a low number bab in the new set?2. There are confirmations of lots of new Disciples / Thadd counters in the new set.3. Drawing is OP regardless, and that won't change.I think it's really funny when people try to place spoiled new cards into the current metagame and don't consider the possibility of what other new cards exsist.
3. It's not just disciples, ET + AoCp, and the person who plays that will have their defense nuked too.
When I was 9 years old, my father told me the secret to being successful. He told me to pick one thing in life and try to do it better than anybody else.I picked complaining.
1. So you knew there was an inish card, but still complained they don't have one.2. But you mentioned disciples, which will be dead next set regardless.3. It's not just disciples, ET + AoCp, and the person who plays that will have their defense nuked too.4. No idea what you're talking about with drawing negation, but drawing will always be the best ability in the game while NJ is still around.@ smug comment, see point 1.Who says I have a set list?
Just curious, Smokey, how exactly do you think ET+AoCP is going to work with Iron Pan up? Just kinda push ET out there and hope you get inish?
I think it's really funny when people try to place spoiled new cards into the current metagame and don't consider the possibility of what other new cards exsist.
1. So you knew there was an inish card, but still complained they don't have one.
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on July 09, 2011, 07:02:42 PMWhen I was 9 years old, my father told me the secret to being successful. He told me to pick one thing in life and try to do it better than anybody else.I picked complaining.Just quoting this to give other people something to agree with.
I have a question, Iron Pan stop Nebuchadnezzar's "add to battle" ability?
Quote from: EmJayBee83 on July 09, 2011, 07:28:49 PMQuote from: YourMathTeacher on July 09, 2011, 07:02:42 PMWhen I was 9 years old, my father told me the secret to being successful. He told me to pick one thing in life and try to do it better than anybody else.I picked complaining.Just quoting this to give other people something to agree with.Wait, is this where I'm supposed to say, "I see what you did there?"
I get so confused.
Quote from: Smokey on July 09, 2011, 07:15:19 PM1. So you knew there was an inish card, but still complained they don't have one.2. But you mentioned disciples, which will be dead next set regardless.3. It's not just disciples, ET + AoCp, and the person who plays that will have their defense nuked too.4. No idea what you're talking about with drawing negation, but drawing will always be the best ability in the game while NJ is still around.@ smug comment, see point 1.Who says I have a set list?1. I'll shut up if you can explain to me how this so called "inish" card counters James SoA, Granny Lois and Mephiboshem 2.3.Quote from: EmJayBee83 on July 09, 2011, 07:28:49 PMJust curious, Smokey, how exactly do you think ET+AoCP is going to work with Iron Pan up? Just kinda push ET out there and hope you get inish?4. Lolwut? Drawing is OP, so if I can draw but you can't that's even more OP. and that's what this card does for DisciplesQuote from: Smokey on July 09, 2011, 05:15:12 PMI think it's really funny when people try to place spoiled new cards into the current metagame and don't consider the possibility of what other new cards exsist.Quote from: Smokey on July 09, 2011, 07:15:19 PM1. So you knew there was an inish card, but still complained they don't have one.These two statements make it pretty obvious, unless you're just blowing smoke.
Quote from: JSB23 on July 09, 2011, 05:37:22 PMI think it's really funny when people act all smug and don't consider the possibility that other people have set lists too I don't understand why so many people have the new set lists. If there are really that many people that know what all the new cards are going to be, why can't we all just have the list?
I think it's really funny when people act all smug and don't consider the possibility that other people have set lists too
Then I thought about it a bit and realized something, this helps Disciples more then it hurts them because:
1. It allows AoCP to take out the opponent's entire defense (as mentioned in the article)
2. Without playing or searching Babylonians have no real way to get initiative (other then Ashpenaz and Nebushashban) so most characters can get initiative to play the aforementioned AoCP.
3. it doesn't hurt Disciples drawing, yes Matthew gets taken out, but Fishing boat and Pentecost are both unaffected (FB is in set aside and Pentecost is a set aside which means it can not be negated).
I don't understand why so many people have the new set lists. If there are really that many people that know what all the new cards are going to be, why can't we all just have the list?
I apologize to those of you who aren't part of that dishonest group and feel slighted that some people know things you don't.
It did seem like quite a few people knew a lot more about the new set... I started to get the feeling that the majority knew, and the minority did not, when it should be the other way around o.O
I don't know what can be done to close Pandora's box
My concern is more about reprints of cards, or cards that make use of other cards. There is a sudden flurry of trading or selling of these cards from people in the know, at the expense of those not in the know.
I'm okay with people playtesting the set...having a vocal minority flaunting (from my perception maybe not true) knowledge of the set can be frustrating especially knowing that other playgroups can keep it a secret.
If somebody would be able to put in the time to put each revisement up on RTS, that'd be fantastic, but it'd be a lot of work.
If somebody would be able to put in the time to put each revisement revision up on RTS, that'd be fantastic, but it'd be a lot of work.
Quote from: COUNTER_SNIPER on July 12, 2011, 02:26:22 PMIt did seem like quite a few people knew a lot more about the new set... I started to get the feeling that the majority knew, and the minority did not, when it should be the other way around o.OAlthough it does seem like more people found out about the new set than should have, it certainly was not a majority thing. Just a very vocal minority