Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Why is behemoth a brontosaurus?
The answer lies to the left...
In the interest of not having this particular thread turn into a Creation/Evolution debate (those can be held in Open Discussion), I have removed a couple of posts. Let me be clear that no one made any attacks or anything like that, I simply wanted to keep this thread from going that direction.
does resurrect apply just to just characters or any card?
Is there a gold version of John in this set?
John the Apocalyptist can use John enhancements and makes them CBN which would allow him to use a lot of the NT gold theme. As for getting a gold version having three of one hero in one set sounds kind of insane to think of.
Quote from: Watchman492 on March 30, 2017, 10:07:08 AMIs there a gold version of John in this set?Quote from: Four_Corners5 on March 30, 2017, 10:40:17 AMJohn the Apocalyptist can use John enhancements and makes them CBN which would allow him to use a lot of the NT gold theme. As for getting a gold version having three of one hero in one set sounds kind of insane to think of.We could print infinite Johns...Spoiler (hover to show)...but we probably won't.
Quote from: Gabe on March 30, 2017, 08:14:12 PMQuote from: Watchman492 on March 30, 2017, 10:07:08 AMIs there a gold version of John in this set?Quote from: Four_Corners5 on March 30, 2017, 10:40:17 AMJohn the Apocalyptist can use John enhancements and makes them CBN which would allow him to use a lot of the NT gold theme. As for getting a gold version having three of one hero in one set sounds kind of insane to think of.We could print infinite Johns...Spoiler (hover to show)...but we probably won't.There probably are infinite Johns out there.Spoiler (hover to show)
It's been a wild day.
No, you have to topdeck or underdeck it. If you were able to steal an opponent's dominant, that would just be deplorable...
Quote from: The Guardian on March 30, 2017, 10:11:57 PMNo, you have to topdeck or underdeck it. If you were able to steal an opponent's dominant, that would just be deplorable... What if their deck is protected? IMO it might be better to say something like "Underdeck a card from opponent's hand or topdeck it to draw X."
Quote from: Kevinthedude on March 31, 2017, 11:31:15 AMQuote from: The Guardian on March 30, 2017, 10:11:57 PMNo, you have to topdeck or underdeck it. If you were able to steal an opponent's dominant, that would just be deplorable... What if their deck is protected? IMO it might be better to say something like "Underdeck a card from opponent's hand or topdeck it to draw X."I don't think protecting their deck means protect from a card being put on/under deck. I believe it has to be protected from wher its coming from.
Are Frog demons a magician because they preformed miraculous signs?