New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
Thanks Tim,I know it's a lot of work to keep this up every year, and I appreciate your service to the overall community by doing it.I'm curious what the "Extra Points" in the next to last column are for.
I like how Tim is in second, when John M actually has more points...
postcount.add(1);
I have a question on the middle columns of the analysis. What do the numbers stand for in the columns below?Column 3: 01-01 all the way through 01-09Column 4: 09-09 through 01-09
Also, it appears you value Net Totals more than grand totals. Any reason why?
Here's an interesting stat:Highest ranked player based on their first year of earning any RNRS points:2002 - John Michaliszyn2003 - Justin Alstad2004 - Ben Shadrick2005 - Tyler Stevens2006 - Gabe Isbell2007 - Mark Underwood2008 - Robert Mulye2009 - Ben Michaliszyn2010 (AKA Rookie of the Year) - Chris Fachman (who beat his brother by 2 pts)
Quote from: Prof Underwood on June 02, 2011, 02:14:35 PMHere's an interesting stat:Highest ranked player based on their first year of earning any RNRS points:2002 - John Michaliszyn2003 - Justin Alstad2004 - Ben Shadrick2005 - Tyler Stevens2006 - Gabe Isbell2007 - Mark Underwood2008 - Robert Mulye2009 - Ben Michaliszyn2010 (AKA Rookie of the Year) - Chris Fachman (who beat his brother by 2 pts)Hahahaha! The only reason I didn't get 2004 was because I got a grand total of 1 point in 2003.
Quote from: redemptioncousin on June 03, 2011, 05:47:09 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on June 02, 2011, 02:14:35 PMHere's an interesting stat:Highest ranked player based on their first year of earning any RNRS points:2002 - John Michaliszyn2003 - Justin Alstad2004 - Ben Shadrick2005 - Tyler Stevens2006 - Gabe Isbell2007 - Mark Underwood2008 - Robert Mulye2009 - Ben Michaliszyn2010 (AKA Rookie of the Year) - Chris Fachman (who beat his brother by 2 pts)Hahahaha! The only reason I didn't get 2004 was because I got a grand total of 1 point in 2003. Which to me, makes the stat extremely uninteresting and it doesn't tell me anything at all. Then again, what do I know, I'm just a noob.
I think this is a really cool statistic but I guess I am biased because I am on it!
Ironically, that is why the Prof posted it in the first place.... same bias....