Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
QuoteIf you really thought it would help you do better on the paper, why not? You believe that the ends justify the means.False hypothetical.
If you really thought it would help you do better on the paper, why not? You believe that the ends justify the means.
Being limitless is hardly a bad thing.
I don't view the Bible as a credible source, actually.
The Bible is not required to be a Christian, the Apostle's Creed defines catholic (liberal connotation) Christianity.
Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 06:10:26 PMThe Bible is not required to be a Christian, the Apostle's Creed defines catholic (liberal connotation) Christianity. What exactly are you saying? Are you saying that you don't have to believe the Bible to be a Christian?I have known people like you. You want to challenge everything, believing that you can determine everything that is real by logic and your own mind. And those kinds of people always worry me. I just hope you realize that some things don't have to be proven. But if you don't believe the Bible, and don't think it's credible, then what do you beleive? Because any other faith or belief that you bring to the table I can find more faults than you can with the Bible.
Research John Locke and social contract theory.
Government is NOT established by God, rather, it is established by man to suppress the individual's rights.
I've seen the Evidence,Colin, you've been swamped in true word. Your doctrine is false.
Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMQuoteIf you really thought it would help you do better on the paper, why not? You believe that the ends justify the means.False hypothetical. Explain why this wouldn't be a logical assumption based on your philosophy that you are espousing.Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMBeing limitless is hardly a bad thing. Humans without limits is most certainly a bad thing. Assuming that you aren't just messing with me here with such a ludicrous statement, your attitude reminds me much of Adam and Eve in the Garden. They wanted to be just like God and didn't want to have limits. Look where that got them (and us).Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMI don't view the Bible as a credible source, actually.We've already discussed this, but I will repeat that your belief on this matter will inevitably lead to your abandoning faith in God at some point in the next 10 years of your life unless you decide to believe that the Bible is credible.
How am I? All he does is ignore us. I give up!
I'm pretty confused as to the last couple of posts but valiant efforts my young friends.
Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMQuoteIf you really thought it would help you do better on the paper, why not? You believe that the ends justify the means.False hypothetical. Explain why this wouldn't be a logical assumption based on your philosophy that you are espousing.
Quote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMBeing limitless is hardly a bad thing. Humans without limits is most certainly a bad thing. Assuming that you aren't just messing with me here with such a ludicrous statement, your attitude reminds me much of Adam and Eve in the Garden. They wanted to be just like God and didn't want to have limits. Look where that got them (and us).
Quote from: Prof Underwood on January 30, 2009, 11:25:35 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on January 30, 2009, 05:43:26 PMQuoteIf you really thought it would help you do better on the paper, why not? You believe that the ends justify the means.False hypothetical. Explain why this wouldn't be a logical assumption based on your philosophy that you are espousing.It's illogical because it is a false hypothetical.
You can't just "decide" to believe something. If you ask "why" and the "why" cannot be answered, then you cannot make an absolute until the "why" is answered. If I psycologically tricked myself into believing the Bible to be infallible just to save my faith, I would be coating myself in deceiption. Cannot the hypothetical "truth"/ "word of God" stand up to the "why"?