Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
See, IMO, I like Obi Wan (1 of the list of my top 5 favorites that I gave the guy) because I have always seen him as a strict, by the letter of the law kind of guy. He had a mentor who bent the rules constantly. He had a padawan (Anakin) who constantly bent the rules and was unorthodox. He was the one staple...the constant...the unmovable. When it came to Luke, I don't see how he bent the rules with Luke. He couldn't train him earlier or Vader & the Emperor would have been tipped off to where he was at. That was more out of necessity than a willful breaking of the rules.
Quote from: soul seeker on April 02, 2009, 01:59:40 PMSee, IMO, I like Obi Wan (1 of the list of my top 5 favorites that I gave the guy) because I have always seen him as a strict, by the letter of the law kind of guy. He had a mentor who bent the rules constantly. He had a padawan (Anakin) who constantly bent the rules and was unorthodox. He was the one staple...the constant...the unmovable. When it came to Luke, I don't see how he bent the rules with Luke. He couldn't train him earlier or Vader & the Emperor would have been tipped off to where he was at. That was more out of necessity than a willful breaking of the rules.A certain point of view, I thought deceit was a dark side trait?
Anti-Deceit is a Christian value that Lucas didn't give the Jedi.
Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.-Han Solo
Quote from: NotOfThisWorld66 on April 04, 2009, 01:50:00 AMHokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.-Han Solo The real irony of that statement is that Obi-Wan used a blaster to kill General Grievious.
You missed the point.
i don't see a point, unless it's on dan ackroyd's head XD
Quote from: NotOfThisWorld66 on April 04, 2009, 01:50:00 AMHokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.-Han SoloQuote Irony.
Obi-Wan: Only a sith deals in absolutes. I will do what I must.
Wow. And I thought I knew the star wars story pretty well. apparently there are books and comics i've never even heard of? when did this happen?~Britta
Quote from: ~Achewon Enleaye~ on April 07, 2009, 04:31:27 PMWow. And I thought I knew the star wars story pretty well. apparently there are books and comics i've never even heard of? when did this happen?~BrittaI have a Star Wars book from 1979, I'm pretty sure is the year. The name eludes me at the moment. It is okay at best, but I kept it because it was written before the "Big Reveal" in Empire Strikes Back. It was a fun to read for that fact alone. The books, comics, and games have come to be known as the "Extended Universe". It really launched and became popular with Timothy Zahn's "Thrawn Trilogy." Zahn was an exceptional writer and added several great characters and an awesome species (the noghri). Everything must be approved by Lucas and all the writers communicate with each other so nothing is out of order in the Extended Universe. Of course, Lucas has changed his mind a few times and had characters killed off in the books. The most obvious is Han and Leia's youngest son Anakin Skywalker Solo. He figured that when the new movies came out that it would be too confusing to have 2 Anakins out and about. At least, that is how the story goes, so Anakin Solo was given a glorified death in the next book. *Special Note about a board member* Tsavong Lah on the board is actually a Star Wars name from one of the books. He is a warmaster of the Yuuzhan Vong during the New Republic era.I hope this helps Britta!