Author Topic: # of posts vs how many posts in a day (Read 3100 times)

The Warrior · « **on:** September 12, 2010, 10:05:27 PM »

im wondering if there is any relation between the number of posts and the how frequently u post.

My Guess is:
The n00bs have low numbers of posts but high frequency cuz they have less posts and post more
Veterans Can have either but a majority will have lots of posts but less frequently

(Plus just curiosity)

get both easily from your profile

Mine : 1731 (3.899 per day)
(1732 now lolz)

JSB23 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 12, 2010, 10:22:23 PM »

3.somethinorother

Smokey · « **Reply #2 on:** September 12, 2010, 10:30:44 PM »

9001 (13.37 per day)

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #3 on:** September 12, 2010, 10:36:23 PM »

Well, people like me who have no life probably have very high frequency. Up to the posting of this message I'm at 7035 (8.355 per day).

SomeKittens · « **Reply #4 on:** September 12, 2010, 10:47:07 PM »

Posts:1600 (11.594 per day)
GET!

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #5 on:** September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM »

The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #6 on:** September 13, 2010, 05:41:26 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM

especially if they are involved in a debate.

Hmm, who could that be.... (even though I'm not a veteran)

The M · « **Reply #7 on:** September 13, 2010, 05:44:02 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM

The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.

WHAT?
I've spammed 4 times when I was new that was about it...
I only have 8 posts a day.

The Warrior · « **Reply #8 on:** September 13, 2010, 05:53:00 PM »

Quote from: The M on September 13, 2010, 05:44:02 PM

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM
The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.
WHAT?

Pwned

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #9 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:01:09 PM »

Quote from: The Warrior on September 13, 2010, 05:53:00 PM

Quote from: The M on September 13, 2010, 05:44:02 PM
Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM
The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.
WHAT?
Pwned

Hey, you're better about spamming these days but you were even worse than The M not that long ago.

The Warrior · « **Reply #10 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:02:05 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 06:01:09 PM

Quote from: The Warrior on September 13, 2010, 05:53:00 PM
Quote from: The M on September 13, 2010, 05:44:02 PM
Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM
The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.
WHAT?
Pwned
Hey, you're better about spamming these days but you were even worse than The M not that long ago.

how so? lolz ticking of raven?

The M · « **Reply #11 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:14:40 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 06:01:09 PM

Quote from: The Warrior on September 13, 2010, 05:53:00 PM
Quote from: The M on September 13, 2010, 05:44:02 PM
Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 05:39:20 PM
The major spammers (especially The M) will probably have the highest frequency. But the veterans will still have a high frequency, especially if they are involved in a debate.
WHAT?
Pwned
Hey, you're better about spamming these days but you were even worse than The M not that long ago.

WHEN DO I SPAM?!?!

Red · « **Reply #12 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:17:21 PM »

2329 (3.556 per day) Not bad and...I have no life.

CJSports · « **Reply #13 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:20:16 PM »

139 posts .874 a day, because I have a life and i don't like to get into discussions that much, but when I do post it is to something i think needs to be argued or opinionated, rarely I spam.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #14 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:23:03 PM »

Better to have two stars and be useful, than five and do nothing but spam.

CJSports · « **Reply #15 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:32:35 PM »

I hate doing this because I know its spam but THANK YOU, I guess its okay to spam once in a while but not consistently.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #16 on:** September 13, 2010, 06:59:15 PM »

Saying "Thank You" isn't spam. It's quite nice, and people should do it more often.

browarod · « **Reply #17 on:** September 13, 2010, 07:11:09 PM »

1066 (0.897 per day)

Not really sure if that means anything. I registered awhile ago but didn't start posting regularly til last year, so my stats are somewhat off.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #18 on:** September 14, 2010, 09:31:57 AM »

5868. 4.1ish per day.

News:

Author Topic: # of posts vs how many posts in a day (Read 3100 times)

browarod

Warrior_Monk