Author Topic: NFL Power Rankings and 1st quarter NFL discussion topics (Read 69067 times)

crustpope · « **Reply #300 on:** December 23, 2009, 02:00:44 AM »

Quote from: Mr.Hiatus on December 22, 2009, 05:41:03 PM

Quote
Dont get me wrong, I think Tenessee is playing the best football of any team not named the Colts
Chargers would be mad.

Then the Chargers are welcome to prove me wrong by beating Tennesee. They get their chance this week.

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #301 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:04:28 PM »

Quote

Then the Chargers are welcome to prove me wrong by beating Tennesee. They get their chance this week.

I say Chargers 35-17.
And to the people saying Ravens are a top team, ninja hit it on the head. A top team does not commit penalties like they do.

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #302 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:11:59 PM »

Quote from: Mr.Hiatus on December 23, 2009, 05:04:28 PM

A top team does not commit penalties like they do.

What do you mean? Green Bay is the most penalized team in the NFL and....

Sigh. You are absolutely correct.

lightningninja · « **Reply #303 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:13:26 PM »

HEY NOW! Also I think it's the Ravens... when they played two weeks ago Packers were 2nd and Ravens were 1st... has that changed?

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #304 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:18:02 PM »

Quote from: lightningninja on December 23, 2009, 05:13:26 PM

HEY NOW! Also I think it's the Ravens... when they played two weeks ago Packers were 2nd and Ravens were 1st... has that changed?

Penalties:

1. Packers 109
2. Bengals 101
3. Eagles 100
3. Cowboys 100

Penalty Yards:

1. Packers 988
2. Ravens 944
3. Eagles 834
4. Cardinals 795

There seem to be a few "top ten" teams in those stats.

lightningninja · « **Reply #305 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:20:06 PM »

Okay so I'm wrong... but whatever.

You know YMT, you've corrected me quite a lot today... you wanna fight?

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #306 on:** December 23, 2009, 05:25:09 PM »

Quote from: lightningninja on December 23, 2009, 05:20:06 PM

You know YMT, you've corrected me quite a lot today... you wanna fight?

I will have to decline your generous offer. I'm old, and I saw what happened to the Talmaranian King in Prince Caspian when he fought a youngun'. If we were fighting over mint ice cream, that would be different.

lightningninja · « **Reply #307 on:** December 23, 2009, 06:04:30 PM »

Hehe... okay so how about them bengals? Okay yeah no caps or extra !!!!!s because honestly... they're starting to let me down.

sk · « **Reply #308 on:** December 24, 2009, 03:50:59 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on December 23, 2009, 05:25:09 PM

Quote from: lightningninja on December 23, 2009, 05:20:06 PM
You know YMT, you've corrected me quite a lot today... you wanna fight?
I will have to decline your generous offer. I'm old, and I saw what happened to the Talmaranian King in Prince Caspian when he fought a youngun'.

Wasn't he actually killed by an adult? I'm not saying that means something... but wasn't he?

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #309 on:** December 24, 2009, 09:03:20 AM »

Quote from: sk on December 24, 2009, 03:50:59 AM

Wasn't he actually killed by an adult? I'm not saying that means something... but wasn't he?

I wasn't talking about the getting killed part. What are you suggesting about lightningninja?

I was talking about the whole getting beat up until I have to ask for a respite. Sure I would have gotten a few good shots in using years of violent movie scene ideas, but eventually my age and his ninja skills would have had me limping back to my corner.

sk · « **Reply #310 on:** December 24, 2009, 09:36:32 AM »

Again, I'm not saying that means something...

For some reason, I was thinking that LN is 17. Perhaps he's an adult and I goofed, but regardless, the Narnian killer wasn't a youngun'.

Captain Kirk · « **Reply #311 on:** December 24, 2009, 03:11:45 PM »

Quote from: sk on December 21, 2009, 10:10:53 PM

Anybody else following tonight's game with the amazing powerhouse known as the Washington Redskins? They've managed a whopping -14 yards in the first half!

We are just playing for a better draft pick now...

My team is at one its lowest points in franchise history. Thankfully, we have a GM for the first time in 10 years, instead of a "Yes Man" in an executive blah blah position and a great chance to have Shanahan as our next coach. Our first round pick from last year, Orakpo, is panning out and Fred Davis has emerged as a playmaker. But the list of bads are so much more...

Kirk

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #312 on:** December 24, 2009, 03:24:39 PM »

Quote from: sk on December 24, 2009, 09:36:32 AM

Again, I'm not saying that means something...

For some reason, I was thinking that LN is 17. Perhaps he's an adult and I goofed, but regardless, the Narnian killer wasn't a youngun'.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

I thought LN was a teenager also. In Prince Caspian, the Talmaranian king fights the teenage Peter. They both take a beating, but Peter would have killed him if the king had not asked for a respite. They had two respites I think. Anyway, the king goes limping back to his corner complaining to his companions. Eventually, Peter wins, but doesn't kill the king. He offers the king's life to Caspian, who also chooses not to kill him. When the king returns to his companions, one of his advisors (generals maybe?) then kills him with one of Susan's arrows to make it look like the Narnians killed him.

So, although I agree that an adult eventually kills the king, I was referring only to the fight between the aging king and the teenage Peter.

crustpope · « **Reply #313 on:** December 25, 2009, 12:20:57 AM »

ANd this has to to with the way my colts are destroying every team they play because....?

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #314 on:** December 25, 2009, 12:54:22 AM »

Quote from: crustpope on December 25, 2009, 12:20:57 AM

ANd this has to to with the way my colts are destroying every team they play because....?

The Talmaranian king was arrogant and refused to believe that a kid could beat him. Soon the Colts will play a "kid" and lose.

As it is, the Vikings seem to have fallen victim to the "backstabbing."

crustpope · « **Reply #315 on:** December 25, 2009, 01:09:25 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on December 25, 2009, 12:54:22 AM

Quote from: crustpope on December 25, 2009, 12:20:57 AM
ANd this has to to with the way my colts are destroying every team they play because....?

The Talmaranian king was arrogant and refused to believe that a kid could beat him. Soon the Colts will play a "kid" and lose.

As it is, the Vikings seem to have fallen victim to the "backstabbing."

Great segue!

But my Colts are more like the High King Peter than that Talmaranian King.

about the Vikes, with all the shilly shallying about who runs the team in Minnesota, I am now REALLY interested in the Monday night game!

sk · « **Reply #316 on:** December 25, 2009, 02:19:52 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on December 24, 2009, 03:24:39 PM

So, although I agree that an adult eventually kills the king, I was referring only to the fight between the aging king and the teenage Peter.

Eh, that's where I goofed. My bad.

Anywho, I'm expecting tomorrow to be a good game when the Chargers beat the Titans. And I'm not just saying that because Stamp needs Chris Johnson's fantasy stats -- I'd like to see the Chargers have some good playoff position. After all, without a team in L.A., they're all we have left...

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #317 on:** December 25, 2009, 04:28:21 PM »

Quote

Soon the Colts will play a "kid" and lose.

Mark Sanchez.

crustpope · « **Reply #318 on:** December 25, 2009, 10:46:05 PM »

The Titans Lost but Johnson ran for 143 yards and a score. That puts him at 1872 for the year. I think the record is out of reach but a 2000 + yard season is easily within reach for him.

To break the record he would have to rush for 234 in his last game against Seattle. Its not outside of the realm of possibility that he could break it. He already has a 228 yard game this year.

So I guess it is possible that he could break it, just not probable.

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #319 on:** December 27, 2009, 04:31:11 PM »

The Packers are in! The Packers are in!

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #320 on:** December 27, 2009, 04:33:04 PM »

So, um.. How bout them saints? Who dat?

lightningninja · « **Reply #321 on:** December 27, 2009, 09:45:55 PM »

Quote from: EmJayBee83 on December 27, 2009, 04:31:11 PM

The Packers are in! The Packers are in!

Really!? I haven't been keeping track of all of their opponents and stuff.

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #322 on:** December 28, 2009, 01:36:33 AM »

My guess on the Chargers-Titans game was almost dead on. I predicted 45-17 Chargers. With the Colts I also said Mark Sanchez would beat them. I am the man.

STAMP · « **Reply #323 on:** December 28, 2009, 11:00:56 AM »

Let's start at the top:

Colts: Wishy-washy to me. One week it's go for 16-0, the next it's don't go for it. Very likely a quick playoff exit.

Saints: Defense has awoken from their dream-state and all witnessed the harsh reality. Also a likely quick playoff exit:

Chargers: With LT's and Gates' resurgence, NO ONE wants to play this team!

Vikings: Days of Favre's Lives. The Young and the Senseless. Go ahead and pick your own soap opera name.

Eagles: After the first half of the Broncos I was thinking they were just as scary as the Chargers. I'm not sure after the second half of that game.

Patriots/Bengals/Cowboys/Packers/Cardinals: All five 10-5 teams have shown brilliance similar to the Chargers. All five teams have also looked like the Lions at times. Maybe one of these teams can catch lightning in a bottle for three playoff games.

The Two AFC Wildcards: The Patriots will thoroughly thrash the #6 seed. The Bengals are an enigma at this point, so their outcome against the #5 seed is a mystery.

Everyone Else: Of the rest, the three teams I like the most to make the jump to the playoffs are the Falcons, the 49ers, and the Favre-led Dolphins.

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #324 on:** December 28, 2009, 07:12:53 PM »

Quote

Colts: Wishy-washy to me. One week it's go for 16-0, the next it's don't go for it. Very likely a quick playoff exit.

Wishy washy? Have you watched their games this season? Jets played a great game and Colts were up til Peyton came out. Chances are they will make it to the Super Bowl.

Quote

Saints: Defense has awoken from their dream-state and all witnessed the harsh reality. Also a likely quick playoff exit:

AS dream does not last 13 or 14 games of the season. Quick playoff exit? Yeah right...

Quote

Chargers: With LT's and Gates' resurgence, NO ONE wants to play this team!

This has happened every year with San Diego idk why people make a big deal about them they always lose in the AFC championship or the game before.

Quote

Eagles: After the first half of the Broncos I was thinking they were just as scary as the Chargers. I'm not sure after the second half of that game.

This team has been wishy washy beginning of the season but they have really stepped it up past few weeks. One bad half, they still won, but one bad half does not define their team.

Quote

Patriots/Bengals/Cowboys/Packers/Cardinals: All five 10-5 teams have shown brilliance similar to the Chargers. All five teams have also looked like the Lions at times. Maybe one of these teams can catch lightning in a bottle for three playoff games.

Not one of these teams has ever looked like the Lions. Maybe they have been beaten badly but that was when Aaron Rodgers threw 3 int's one game and Cardinals had 7 turnovers in one game. Other three might have had a bad game but never like the Lions.

News:

Author Topic: NFL Power Rankings and 1st quarter NFL discussion topics (Read 69067 times)