Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
What is going to be great is that, when Redemption online happens, you can choose to see your opponent's cards in whichever arrangement you like.
postcount.add(1);
Redemption needs big tables. 'Nuff said. Byron, you never saw me in action? (crazy hat guy). I'm a super stickler about card location.I might try some of these on for size, they at least make sense.
If the illustration above says anything about CA style, I don't see how one requires a table more or less "deep" than the other. Both seem to require you be able to stack your cards three-plus deep (how does that image make it more clear that a Hero has been pushed out into battle? It seems prone to the same sloppy execution as the rulebook layout) and puts your Arts, Forts and set-asides wherever you can make space for them.People also neglect the power of the "tap". My unoccupied Sites are off to one side and turned sideways so it is immediately clear that they are a). not a Lost Soul and b). not occupied. My Redeemed Souls are in a fanned stack and turned sideways so that can also be seen at a glance. Even my removed cards, rather than try and find some weird place to put them, I put them under my discards, face-down and turned sideways for a clear distinction.In addition, I always mark my converted characters with colored stones anyway, because knowing their alignment is one thing but keeping track of their brigade is difficult no matter where you stick your Heroes. So my opponents should be able to tell the converted state of any of my characters at a glance.
How would we decide which format to use? vote on it?
Quote from: crustpope on August 18, 2010, 09:58:22 PMHow would we decide which format to use? vote on it?Has it been decided that we need an official arrangement?
Quote from: metalpsalm on August 21, 2010, 04:15:25 PMQuote from: crustpope on August 18, 2010, 09:58:22 PMHow would we decide which format to use? vote on it?Has it been decided that we need an official arrangement? that's what this thread was supposed to be about in the first place...I'd vote for it. It solve lots of confusion.
I have many hats. It's a shame Nats was only three days, so I could only wear three
I vote against your vote.
Yeah well, I negate your vote with "Florida Recount"
Which is why 1960 is one of the best 2-player board games around.
I vote against it, why play in a style that is confusing to you?
Yes, but who'd want to try to get Nixon elected?
Quote from: SomeKittens on August 20, 2010, 10:22:35 AMI have many hats. It's a shame Nats was only three days, so I could only wear threeI KNOW! Isn't that sad? I love weird hats ^_^ I gotta get up to 31 so I can have one for every day of the month.Quote from: SomeKittens on August 21, 2010, 05:02:41 PMI vote against your vote.Yeah well, I negate your vote with "Florida Recount"
