Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Quote from: Ring Wraith on August 17, 2010, 12:29:03 AMQuote from: crustpope on August 16, 2010, 11:48:12 PMActually california style makes a whole lot of sense with Evil on one side and good on the other. so if the PTB Do mandate a style, I think it should be California style...But I woldnt hold my breath about mandating a specific style because all you have to do is ask your opponent what they have showing and they have to tell you.why not just the style as shown in the rule book?1. it an get confusing when EC's are converted and then sometimes "slip" back down to the EC level, 2. having to move your heros out of the way every time you block.3. Artifacts getting lost in all the Fortress/art/discard clutter that happens around the draw pile.4. Bigger decks need more room to spread out.5. ...should I keep going?
Quote from: crustpope on August 16, 2010, 11:48:12 PMActually california style makes a whole lot of sense with Evil on one side and good on the other. so if the PTB Do mandate a style, I think it should be California style...But I woldnt hold my breath about mandating a specific style because all you have to do is ask your opponent what they have showing and they have to tell you.why not just the style as shown in the rule book?
Actually california style makes a whole lot of sense with Evil on one side and good on the other. so if the PTB Do mandate a style, I think it should be California style...But I woldnt hold my breath about mandating a specific style because all you have to do is ask your opponent what they have showing and they have to tell you.
I'll just repeat myself to make the point abundantly clear to future readers of this thread:Quote from: Alex_Olijar on August 17, 2010, 12:48:03 AMWhy not just have a unified standard? i.e. the rulebookP.S. Was 87% an arbitrary picked number or scientific poll?
Why not just have a unified standard? i.e. the rulebook
I'll just repeat myself to make the point abundantly clear to future readers of this thread:Quote from: Alex_Olijar on August 17, 2010, 12:48:03 AMWhy not just have a unified standard? i.e. the rulebook
it'd be nice if the PTB would set up a mandatory placement of cards.
why not just the style as shown in the rule book?
Nice Quote confusion there, Ring Wraith.
Quote1. it can get confusing when EC's are converted and then sometimes "slip" back down to the EC level, 1: evil convert cards? name 5. now name 1 that is played frequently.
1. it can get confusing when EC's are converted and then sometimes "slip" back down to the EC level,
I'm pioneering my own styleDeck goes face down in opponent's territoryHeroes go face up on top of deck so they are flushEvil characters go face up on the bottom of the deck so they are flushLost souls I've rescued go on the bottom of my deck so they are perpendicularLost souls in my LOB go on the top of my deck so they are perpendicularI hold items set aside in my handMy opponent holds cards removed from the game in his handFortresses go on the top of my deck at a 45 degree angleArtifacts go on the bottom of my deck at a 45 degree angleMy hand is placed under a table leg beings it is a wobbly table EDIT: My discard pile will be on the table next to me. If something is placed in my territory (IE: ABOM) I just throw it and let it land wherever. That is its spot.
postcount.add(1);
"Though it really ticks me off when people have a massively disorganized territory." does sloppy count? or everything outta place?
DOES THIS PICTURE BOTHER YOU!?!? LOOK AT IT. LOOK AT THE CARDS.
Quote from: Ring Wraith on August 17, 2010, 01:04:02 AMQuote1. it can get confusing when EC's are converted and then sometimes "slip" back down to the EC level, 1: evil convert cards? name 5. now name 1 that is played frequently.I was talking about converting evil characters soooo.The word spreads, sanctifying faith, repentance, preaching the truth, fishers of men, A new creation, repentance and restitution, meeting the messiah, Holy grail, ...