Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Your logic confuses me, the only way to limit spending is not to limit it hmm....
Quote from: JSB23 on October 27, 2010, 09:31:45 PMYour logic confuses me, the only way to limit spending is not to limit it hmm....His logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.
First of all, economic emergencies don't count.
IMO there is no "too big to fail" and if there is the the government let it happen on their watch and they all deserve to reap the benefits of the angry voters that come to Washington with pitchforks and torches.
Second, I would not consider Iraq or Afghanistan an Emergency.
If you're mad at me about the science thread get mad at me over there. Your holier-then-thou-tirades aren't wanted here.
Quote from: JSB23 on October 27, 2010, 10:12:00 PMIf you're mad at me about the science thread get mad at me over there. Your holier-then-thou-tirades aren't wanted here. That you're treating Matt (and Ironica) with so little consideration is a fact that has nothing to do with me or with other threads.
This isn't about anybody being holier than anybody. This is about stopping with the snide comments long enough to actually listen to what other people are saying.
If you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.
Other then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an example
If I make snide comments about someone's post I would have needed to read the post first
I would like to remind you this is the internet, I can express myself in anyway I choose.
Quote from: JSB23 on October 27, 2010, 10:51:59 PMIf you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.So basically, I was correct to say you should not treat people that way.QuoteUhhh.. no, I deleted the post because it was just plain wrong, if it had been accurate I would have kept itQuote from: The Schaef on October 27, 2010, 11:03:09 PMQuoteOther then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an exampleThe specific sentence I quoted was your sarcastic response to him that misinterprets what he said. So either you were being sarcastic because you wanted to belittle his intelligence, or you were deliberately misinterpreting him to make him sound unintelligent. So far I have given you benefit of the doubt that you were not doing this deliberately, and suggested that working to achieve an understanding instead of crossing people about a misunderstanding has a positive outcome for everybody.QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. As I said before if he was offended he would have said somethingand this was your idea of meeting half way? QuoteHis logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.Quoteviolates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
Uhhh.. no, I deleted the post because it was just plain wrong, if it had been accurate I would have kept itQuote from: The Schaef on October 27, 2010, 11:03:09 PMQuoteOther then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an exampleThe specific sentence I quoted was your sarcastic response to him that misinterprets what he said. So either you were being sarcastic because you wanted to belittle his intelligence, or you were deliberately misinterpreting him to make him sound unintelligent. So far I have given you benefit of the doubt that you were not doing this deliberately, and suggested that working to achieve an understanding instead of crossing people about a misunderstanding has a positive outcome for everybody.QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. As I said before if he was offended he would have said somethingand this was your idea of meeting half way? QuoteHis logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.Quoteviolates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
QuoteOther then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an exampleThe specific sentence I quoted was your sarcastic response to him that misinterprets what he said. So either you were being sarcastic because you wanted to belittle his intelligence, or you were deliberately misinterpreting him to make him sound unintelligent. So far I have given you benefit of the doubt that you were not doing this deliberately, and suggested that working to achieve an understanding instead of crossing people about a misunderstanding has a positive outcome for everybody.QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. As I said before if he was offended he would have said somethingand this was your idea of meeting half way? QuoteHis logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.Quoteviolates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
You're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. As I said before if he was offended he would have said somethingand this was your idea of meeting half way? QuoteHis logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.Quoteviolates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
His logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.
violates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards
Quote from: JSB23 on October 27, 2010, 10:51:59 PMIf you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.I deleted the post because it was just plain wrong, if it had been accurate I would have kept it
You're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me.
and this was your idea of meeting half way?
I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. Based on a misinterpretation. And your tone did not reflect a mere question.
You're not really making your other posts look any better by attacking me also. It just proves my point.
If you think that was my point, can you demonstrate where I made that claim?Exactly how long do you intend to keep seeing how far you can push me?
I've already explained everything I intend to explain. I'm not interested in playing mind games with you. And your response to me in the form of sarcasm and snide comments tells me you're not interested in playing this straight. So we're at an impasse.
I'm just curious how you knew my post was an attack when it clearly wasn't
Quote from: JSB23 on October 28, 2010, 12:36:01 AMI'm just curious how you knew my post was an attack when it clearly wasn'tI'm curious how "clearly" you can make this claim when it is so easily interpreted sarcastically and you have exhibited a pattern of sarcasm and condescension in this thread and others in recent days and weeks. In light of that, how "clear" is this really?
I can't prove you're wrong so if it makes you happy to think you're right go right ahead I can't stop you
Tonight I realized that Inception totally ripped off of The Princess Bride.
Quote from: Ring Wraith on October 28, 2010, 01:08:39 AMTonight I realized that Inception totally ripped off of The Princess Bride.How so? (I've never seen The Princess Bride, so don't laugh too hard if I'm missing something).-C_S
And HEY HOW ABOUT THAT MOVIE THAT WAS IN A THEATER...
Author
Topic: Inception (Potential Spoilers) (Read 18478 times)
