« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...  (Read 3345 times)

Offline I am Knot a Blonde!

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 609
  • You are now breathing manually.
    • -
    • Southeast Region
    • www.google.com
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2012, 05:55:50 PM »
0
We are very T1 heavy, so that will definitely work. Here is what we will try.

Dominants may not exceed lost soul count.
The number of good cards must be equal to the number of evil cards.
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2012, 06:58:15 PM »
0
Not to mention this should be in the Game Play Variations subforum.  Turns out we actually have a place for "player made types"
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #27 on: March 15, 2012, 07:19:01 PM »
+1
People assume that there IS a way to fix things. The problem is, it's not broken, it just doesn't run how some people would want it, so it doesn't need fixing. If you "fix" it, then there will be others who don't like the way things are.

And seeing how you live in Florida, I don't think you have anything to worry about with that metagame.  :D
Logged

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #28 on: March 15, 2012, 07:24:15 PM »
0
-_-

You're pretty much saying this game is perfect game. That couldn't be further from the truth.
Logged
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #29 on: March 15, 2012, 07:25:23 PM »
+2
I'm still trying to figure out why you don't just go play some other mainstream CCG, as much as you bring them up, MKC.
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #30 on: March 15, 2012, 07:30:57 PM »
0
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on March 15, 2012, 07:25:23 PM
I'm still trying to figure out why you don't just go play some other mainstream CCG, as much as you bring them up, MKC.
Accusing someone of being too mainstream?  Hipster.

I agree with MKC.  Redemption could learn some from other CCGs.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #31 on: March 15, 2012, 07:36:26 PM »
+1
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on March 15, 2012, 07:25:23 PM
I'm still trying to figure out why you don't just go play some other mainstream CCG, as much as you bring them up, MKC.

I do. Most of them. I'm still trying to figure out why people keep drumming up that same tired argument anytime anyone shows displeasure in the broken aspects of this game.
Logged
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #32 on: March 15, 2012, 08:36:25 PM »
0
I don't understand some of the harsh responses to a suggestion for another type that combines elements of both T1 and T2.  I don't think the OP said to eliminate T1.  I just think there is an interest in another format.  If there is enough interest over time, it might actually be officially implemented, especially if they would allow certain smaller tournaments to host whatever events they wanted to.  A sixty card deck with the same number of evil and good cards, capped at 8 dominants, sounds very interesting, in my opinion.  It is also easier on the budget of poorer players who can't afford 4 of every card.  I for one look forward to hearing how it goes.

Please keep us posted.
Logged

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #33 on: March 15, 2012, 10:10:20 PM »
+2
Quote from: stefferweffer on March 15, 2012, 08:36:25 PM
I don't understand some of the harsh responses to a suggestion for another type that combines elements of both T1 and T2.

I think the harsh response was a direct result of the harsh approach. If Knot had just stated his idea without the personal attacks on Rob, then there would not have been as much of a backlash. We all like hearing new ideas.  ;D
Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #34 on: March 16, 2012, 02:30:50 AM »
0
Quote from: I am Knot a Blonde! on March 15, 2012, 05:13:49 PM
Okay, so, listen. I'm just saying that some people have complaints about T2, some people have complaints about T1, so why not make a player made type that everyone can agree on?

You can do that, plenty of people have. And they've done it without accusing Rob of refusing to listen to his player base.
Logged

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Since it seems Cactus won't do it...
« Reply #35 on: March 16, 2012, 01:23:33 PM »
0
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on March 15, 2012, 10:10:20 PM
Quote from: stefferweffer on March 15, 2012, 08:36:25 PM
I don't understand some of the harsh responses to a suggestion for another type that combines elements of both T1 and T2.

I think the harsh response was a direct result of the harsh approach. If Knot had just stated his idea without the personal attacks on Rob, then there would not have been as much of a backlash. We all like hearing new ideas.  ;D

After all, there is a 2009 Type NW National Champion.  Try an approach that includes humility, grace and lovingkindness. :)
Logged
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal