Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Quote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel
The gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.
That doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).
Quote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights Colin
Quote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:06:21 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.This is way too much quoting.
Quote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 03:08:18 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:06:21 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.This is way too much quoting.Yeah.Did you know that some scholars believe that Pricillia could have written Hebrews?
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:08:59 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 03:08:18 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:06:21 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.This is way too much quoting.Yeah.Did you know that some scholars believe that Pricillia could have written Hebrews?yeah that is a lot of quoting. oh and colin
Quote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 03:12:56 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:08:59 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 03:08:18 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:06:21 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.This is way too much quoting.Yeah.Did you know that some scholars believe that Pricillia could have written Hebrews?yeah that is a lot of quoting. oh and colin It's about the Bible.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:20:43 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 03:12:56 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:08:59 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 03:08:18 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 03:06:21 PMQuote from: adamfincher on July 28, 2009, 02:55:19 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:47:34 PMQuote from: FresnoRedemption on July 28, 2009, 02:44:30 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 02:19:58 PMQuote from: Prof Underwood on July 28, 2009, 01:54:10 PMQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMThe gospel of Judas is somewhat interesting.Yes, in the same sense that watching a snake shed it's skin is interesting. They are both all twisted up and leave you with something hollow, lifeless, and useless My thoughts the gospel of JudasQuote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:50:28 PMThat doesn't mean it isn't a gospel, it just means it isn't a Biblical gospel. How about if you let those of us who actually believe that the Bible is God's Word decide what is a Gospel It's a gospel because it's a historical text narrating the life of Jesus.It's not a historical text. First, the Gospel of Judas was not written by Judas (making it pseudonymous -- and to be clear, even though the author of Hebrews is unknown, it does not make a false claim as to its authorship) -- which right away disqualifies it from being the inspired Word of God, and second it was written in the 2nd century, after Judas died (meaning that, again, it wasn't written by Judas and, unlike the four canonical gospels, it is not an eyewitness account of the life and ministry of Jesus).However, it still is a "gospel" (whether it is a true or false gospel) and, like the other gospels, it provides a perspective on how Jesus was viewed in the second century. It is a historical text, it just cannot all be verified to be true.I also stand by the archeological method (a.k.a. the genealogical method) as the best hermeneutic for scripture (or an other topic).Stop Picking Fights ColinNaw.This is way too much quoting.Yeah.Did you know that some scholars believe that Pricillia could have written Hebrews?yeah that is a lot of quoting. oh and colin It's about the Bible.To add to the quoting... This is about ur favorite Bible book.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 28, 2009, 01:11:37 PMStop Picking Fights ColinNaw.
Stop Picking Fights Colin
colin the gnostic books are false and my favrite book is judges.
colin the gnostic books are false
Quote from: RED on July 30, 2009, 11:05:51 AMcolin the gnostic books are falseProve it.
Quote from: Colin Michael on July 30, 2009, 01:20:47 PMQuote from: RED on July 30, 2009, 11:05:51 AMcolin the gnostic books are falseProve it.Prove They aren't
Not how it works.
Although it can be historically proven false...
that argument is over
Author
Topic: Books (Read 9655 times)
