Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
(Those wanting background info here it is http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/index.php?topic=22959.0)I for one have learned a several very valuable lessons like... The REG is irrelevantPlay as's don't change abilities (except when they do) AoCP has no reference so it is a different card from AoC And moderators can't handle logic and snarky comments
postcount.add(1);
1 - I didn't participate in the Matthew vs AoCP thread. I didn't lock it. I didn't do anything to any posts there. I don't have strong feelings about the issue one way or the other at this point.2 - I did read the thread, and Clift, I did not find your posts there to be inappropriate. I did find some of the other posts in the thread to be either spam or disrespectful, and therefore, I'm not surprised that it was locked (especially considering it was a ruling thread that had already received an official ruling).3 - JSB, I know that we've had a lot of disagreements lately on the forum, so I hate to start another one. However, your posts on the original thread as well as this one are inappropriate and inaccurate. The general trend of your posts being critical, sarcastic, insulting, etc. is really getting old. Are you trying to be so offensive, or are you really unaware of how your posts come across?4 - MKC, your posts go against the grain on a fairly regular basis, and you're still here. Censorship does not come from differences of opinion, but rather when a thread derails into inappropriate or disrespectful ways.
i find it amusing the amount of censorship that goes on around here just to silence those that do not think with the grain...yet no action is done to those that hold higher positions and have no proper rebuttal than to reply with highly unnecessary snarky remarks. it reminds me of v for vendetta.
Quote from: Master KChief on August 23, 2010, 01:53:20 AMi find it amusing the amount of censorship that goes on around here just to silence those that do not think with the grain...yet no action is done to those that hold higher positions and have no proper rebuttal than to reply with highly unnecessary snarky remarks. it reminds me of v for vendetta.I find it equally amusing - if not more so - that you cannot register this complaint without distorting the issue to make it appear as though your remarks are wholly appropriate and innocuous...
while your tyrant oppressors have no intelligent rejoinder to your noble efforts to benefit society.
That doesn't fly very well when someone takes the time to speak directly to your accusations, only to have you dismiss his entire post...
and fling another accusation at him based on a position of authority he has only held for the last few months...
i belive my statements were appropriate and harmless. others felt the same way. who are the only people that dont? oh, thats right, the elders/mods/people in power...*cough cough bias*
no need to be a drama queen.
the post was downright rude and condescending. no one liked it. of course its going to get dismissed and -1'd to oblivion.
actually, if you read closely, the accusation is directed at whoever did the censoring.
Except Mark's response was not as such and seems only to have one -1 attached to it. I won't presume the lone offended party but I have my guesses.
This is blatantly false. You responded to Mark's post and specifically said "YOU". Mark specifically stated in his post that he did not alter any of the posts in the thread in question. So either you are lying or you are accusing Mark of lying.
Quote from: The Schaef on August 23, 2010, 08:44:21 AMExcept Mark's response was not as such and seems only to have one -1 attached to it. I won't presume the lone offended party but I have my guesses.QuoteThis is blatantly false. You responded to Mark's post and specifically said "YOU". Mark specifically stated in his post that he did not alter any of the posts in the thread in question. So either you are lying or you are accusing Mark of lying....who said anything about mark? since when has a single -1 ever correlated on a level of RED standards? read some more.
...who said anything about mark? since when has a single -1 ever correlated on a level of RED standards? read some more.
Quote from: Master KChief on August 23, 2010, 08:48:14 AMQuote from: The Schaef on August 23, 2010, 08:44:21 AMExcept Mark's response was not as such and seems only to have one -1 attached to it. I won't presume the lone offended party but I have my guesses.QuoteThis is blatantly false. You responded to Mark's post and specifically said "YOU". Mark specifically stated in his post that he did not alter any of the posts in the thread in question. So either you are lying or you are accusing Mark of lying....who said anything about mark? since when has a single -1 ever correlated on a level of RED standards? read some more.Um I take offense. But I believe speaking one's mind is not wrong...at all.
If no one has realized yet, it is spelled aggravated.
so i guess everyone here is aggrivated?
Seems like if people are getting all tore up about what's be'n said on a Christian Card Game Forum, and we're not discussing the things of God, there's a bigger problem, than just the comments on the forums that are bothering individuals.Daniel p.s. comma splices for everyone.
At MKC, yes. At Mods, No, cept maybe Schaef cuz be keeps taking MKC's bait.
Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on August 23, 2010, 11:46:43 AMAt MKC, yes. At Mods, No, cept maybe Schaef cuz be keeps taking MKC's bait.I'm just making the observation that nobody is buying his tired "victim" act.