Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: Lamborghini_diablo on April 04, 2009, 09:43:21 PM

Title: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on April 04, 2009, 09:43:21 PM

(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi189.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fz18%2FLambo_Diablo_Svtt%2FUselessTactics-1.jpg&hash=bfa83a0b9d678b330f5e8a0227aa58a9a76e2839)

A fun idea I had. In case some of you cry out OVERPOWERED... it affects the player who uses it too, like A Pole.

This is to help combat all the pre-block stuff that keeps being added.

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: Colin Michael on April 04, 2009, 09:45:43 PM

I don't think it's overpowered at all; it's actually rather well balanced even if it didn't hit both players.

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: Isildur on April 04, 2009, 09:51:34 PM

This would cause a problem with set asides >.< As in not fun for rules >.<

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on April 04, 2009, 09:52:47 PM

Ooops. I never even though of that. Let me add "In battle."

Fixed

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: lightningninja on April 05, 2009, 09:32:29 PM

I LOVE this card. I would really like to see it made. Although it just made ehud very interesting... cause THEN he chooses the blocker after they waste an enhancement.  ;D

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: BubbleBoy on April 05, 2009, 10:11:43 PM

Would it be inconceivable to make it say good cards instead of heroes & enhancements? TGT needs a counter.

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: TimMierz on April 05, 2009, 10:13:10 PM

Fortresses would not be "in battle".

Title: Re: Useless Tactics remake
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on April 05, 2009, 11:42:40 PM

besides, TGT does NOT ignore. All it does is give the ability to the HEROES. so their new ability would be delayed as well.

Also, if it delayed all card, it could delay dominants too. That would be TOO powerful.