Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: hi123 on April 26, 2011, 07:49:57 PM
-
No numbers, orange enhancement.
SA= Interrupt the Battle and shuffle up to two hero's in battle. Owner may shuffle all of his sites in territory to negate this.
Scripture; Gensis, chapter 3.
-
What happens if the heroes are not owned by the same person?
-
Shuffle up to two heroes in battle. Owner may shuffle all of his sites instead.
Fixed.
-
Just say "any player"
-
Owner? I still own a hero if my opponent banded to it. So, it's not fixed. Controlled would work, but that's not really a technical term, other than for rulings.
-
In my version, the owner of said hero could shuffle their sites in to keep it in battle.
Previous version, if ANYONE shuffled, then the entire card was negated.
-
Not meaning to suggest a drastic change (here I am about to suggest a drastic change)
I think it would be better to make the ability stronger and simpler and remove the two heroes from the game
-
Not meaning to suggest a drastic change (here I am about to suggest a drastic change)
I think it would be better to make the ability stronger and simpler and remove the two heroes from the game
Well, Adam or Eve didnt die because of their sin, they were just removed from the garden as their punishment.
-
I like it but I think it should ITB because demons rarely get initiative because of all the banding...
-
Demons have some of the best initiative characters in the game. Just go in with a single demon and you're good to go.
-
I like it but I think it should ITB because demons rarely get initiative because of all the banding...
You do make a good point. I will make it ITB because their arnt a lot of battle winners for orange. They do have good EC's.
-
With current rules, I could shuffle all zero of my sites to negate it.
-
Which is exceedingly bogus. However, Site use is so prevalent these days, and so often the shuffle option will be unavailable due to your opponent having CP that it's not overly-crippling.
-
Consider though, the two finalists in the nationals didn't play sites.
-
Consider though, the two finalists in the nationals didn't play sites.
....And then Disciples was released.
-
I'm still expecting two of the three top nats people to not use sites (except access ones).
-
Not meaning to suggest a drastic change (here I am about to suggest a drastic change)
I think it would be better to make the ability stronger and simpler and remove the two heroes from the game
Well, Adam or Eve didnt die because of their sin, they were just removed from the garden as their punishment.
key word "REMOVED" from the garden. personally, whether or not they died, I'd like to see them removed from the game, rather than shuffled
Consider though, the two finalists in the nationals didn't play sites.
this would also require multi-colored sites to be shuffled, i like it a lot
-
It should be "heroes" not "hero's". It's plural, not possessive.
[/grammarnazi]
-
It could have a penalty for not having sites, like possibly discarding a fortress.