Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: Arrthoa on April 23, 2016, 08:38:02 PM

Title: Site Cards
Post by: Arrthoa on April 23, 2016, 08:38:02 PM
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDvP86aI.jpg&hash=a924db239e4e18a348d28be2f4ac5d8b1046fa50)
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FVf2jaYQ.jpg&hash=558d63e17d48d4f4ea554295f089eccf61e0846b)
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F5ZofAWk.jpg&hash=5c914c7290ce84d195878b0ae6a0dda7cb9d4b7c)
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FizfbcjE.jpg&hash=70e89fbb4d33bfef017a37015f7543600021ffeb)
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Ironisaac on April 23, 2016, 09:18:45 PM
i think assyria and babylon might be a bit op, but i like nineva and halah.
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Arrthoa on April 23, 2016, 09:20:53 PM
Which parts on them seem OP
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Ironisaac on April 23, 2016, 09:31:30 PM
actually, assyria is fine, but i think that the "regardless of protection" on babylon is op imo
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Redoubter on April 23, 2016, 10:23:19 PM
I would have to agree that Assyria is OP, if it is supposed to protect each battle from the first enhancement (it doesn't quite use our standard wording for that now, but I'll assume that's what it means).

Protection from the first enhancement is incredibly strong, and I would hesitate to give that to defenses (particularly in Pale Green).

The fact that it has that really-powerful ability, plus can hold many souls, plus gives a Cannot Be Ignored effect, is a bit much on one site.
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Minister Polarius on April 25, 2016, 09:54:54 PM
Nineveh is hilarious because it's better for your opponent than you.
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Ironisaac on April 25, 2016, 11:12:33 PM
Nineveh is hilarious because it's better for your opponent than you.

How so?
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: browarod on April 25, 2016, 11:21:03 PM
If your Ninevah is occupied and you are making a rescue attempt your opponent can play SoG/NJ during your battle to rescue the soul and your heroes would be underdecked.
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: kariusvega on April 25, 2016, 11:34:07 PM
dig these ideas! cool sites that need reprints and great art choices!
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Gabe on April 25, 2016, 11:51:47 PM
If your Ninevah is occupied and you are making a rescue attempt your opponent can play SoG/NJ during your battle to rescue the soul and your heroes would be underdecked.

Also, by the rules of battle resolution, I don't believe the awarding of the Lost Soul is the last step. If that's accurate, there's no longer Hero left in battle at the time the Lost Soul is awarded (they've all returned to territory).

If only there was a way to give your opponent a Site and occupy it... ::)
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: The Guardian on April 26, 2016, 12:17:01 AM
Also, by the rules of battle resolution, I don't believe the awarding of the Lost Soul is the last step. If that's accurate, there's no longer Hero left in battle at the time the Lost Soul is awarded (they've all returned to territory).

If only there was a way to give your opponent a Site and occupy it... ::)

Hmm...Gabe is there still time to change that one Lost Soul so it does the opposite?  :o
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Arrthoa on April 26, 2016, 10:09:13 AM
Would this be a better phrasing for Nineveh "If a opponent makes a successful rescue attempt at this site, underdeck all of opponent's heroes in battle."
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Gabe on April 26, 2016, 10:21:15 AM
Would this be a better phrasing for Nineveh "If a opponent makes a successful rescue attempt at this site, underdeck all of opponent's heroes in battle."

If you say "...underdeck all rescuing Heroes" it should work they way you intend. :)
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: Arrthoa on April 26, 2016, 12:06:09 PM
Okay, thanks
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: wyatt_marcum on April 26, 2016, 03:21:08 PM
maybe to make Babylon a little less OP, make it a Babylonian King. that limits to only two kings that are decent (Neb and Beltshazzar), and doesnt let the capture be CBN & regardless of protection from Nerg.
Title: Re: Site Cards
Post by: The Schaefer on April 26, 2016, 04:25:09 PM
Like the ideas. I'd say the Nineveh should read if a hero rescues a soul from this site so it doesn't potentially help your opponent. And then for halah id probably have it capture a king not just a king of israel. That's just to make it a little more playable though.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal