Author Topic: Saul/Paul Reprint (Read 11068 times)

megamanlan · « **Reply #25 on:** March 08, 2011, 12:33:02 AM »

But he wasnt married... but thats funny.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #26 on:** March 08, 2011, 02:22:19 AM »

Quote from: megamanlan on March 08, 2011, 12:33:02 AM

But he wasnt married... but thats funny.

Paul probably was married, actually. You couldn't have been a Pharisee and single in that culture.

The Guardian · « **Reply #27 on:** March 08, 2011, 02:29:05 AM »

The only thing I would change about Saul is to make him 10/11 instead of 11/10 so he's more useful in FBTN scenarios.

Don't forget that Paul enjoys the effects of Obadiah's Caves and Herod's Temple making him fairly invincible since most of the CBN evil cards are discard or capture.

Also of note, I built a T2 offense around Paul recently and Gabe said it was one of the best offenses he's ever played against.

And no I'm not telling what it was...

megamanlan · « **Reply #28 on:** March 08, 2011, 04:20:58 PM »

...okay... I'm just trying to make Saul the most useless EC ever. They might as well just put his effect as 'Opponent may play the First Enhancement." literally. Thats why I lower his numbers by quite a bit, and I stopped Herod's Temple before, just toss Peter's Curse on it.

Red · « **Reply #29 on:** March 08, 2011, 05:08:14 PM »

Paul's SA is biblically accurate. Acts 28:1-6.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #30 on:** March 08, 2011, 05:12:46 PM »

How can you be protect from capture or conversion? I think you mean and.

The M · « **Reply #31 on:** March 08, 2011, 05:15:07 PM »

If they are doing both you get captured or converted. Holder's choice.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #32 on:** March 08, 2011, 06:37:18 PM »

If you manage to do both simultaneously, props.

The M · « **Reply #33 on:** March 08, 2011, 07:43:47 PM »

Couldn't you just play a convert and a capture, have them negated by a FBTN, and then negate that on an unnegatable enhancement character?

megamanlan · « **Reply #34 on:** March 08, 2011, 10:15:12 PM »

And is what I mean't but he can't be converted at all. He can be Captured by a Roman though. And it doesn't make sense that the guy that gave more than half of the New Testament and refuted every false teaching of the day and this time means he couldn't be converted. And the Jews and others could never capture Paul only the Romans ever did.

megamanlan · « **Reply #35 on:** March 08, 2011, 10:22:30 PM »

Quote from: Red on March 08, 2011, 05:08:14 PM

Paul's SA is biblically accurate. Acts 28:1-6.

But u forget the 'Thorn of the Flesh' That Paul mentions in 1 Cor. 12:7 which would be a disease, and he was blind just after he was converted which also would be a disease/poison card. Not to mention that was one time that God used to disprove their false god. Which means that it was a special occasion when that didn't happen. I know there's other ones, I just can't remember them right now and going through all of Paul's Letters isn't a good idea when I have other things to do right now.

Red · « **Reply #36 on:** March 09, 2011, 09:03:54 AM »

It's not a poision. It's a disease which is different by both Redemption and real life.

megamanlan · « **Reply #37 on:** March 12, 2011, 11:03:20 PM »

Well, as far as I know, Poisons and Diseases are treated exactly the same.

Red · « **Reply #38 on:** March 18, 2011, 08:33:29 PM »

Quote from: megamanlan on March 12, 2011, 11:03:20 PM

Well, as far as I know, Poisons and Diseases are treated exactly the same.

This is gonna sound pyscho but I'm gonna do it anyway. Someone puts aresnic in your food. Or you come down with the flu. It's not the same. Both hurt you but 1 isn't on purpose.

browarod · « **Reply #39 on:** March 18, 2011, 08:55:13 PM »

Technically speaking, diseases can be given on purpose, too.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #40 on:** March 19, 2011, 12:41:49 PM »

Yes! Those evil pigs, trying to give us all flu....

megamanlan · « **Reply #41 on:** March 20, 2011, 06:23:20 PM »

okay... I'm just saying that in my rulebook Poisons and Dieases are both treated like a poison as far as I know. And besides that would be better off as an enhancement anyway.

Dario Dante · « **Reply #42 on:** March 26, 2011, 02:13:56 PM »

I like Saul/Paul the way he is.

megamanlan · « **Reply #43 on:** March 26, 2011, 04:59:46 PM »

Im okay w/ that, Im just saying they could make him a lot better because for the most part he cant work well in a Pharisee Deck.

Red · « **Reply #44 on:** March 26, 2011, 05:27:25 PM »

For the 100,000th time he isn't supposed to be used as a EC.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #45 on:** March 26, 2011, 05:57:06 PM »

Quote from: Red on March 26, 2011, 05:27:25 PM

For the 100,000th time he isn't supposed to be used as a EC.

Then why is he an EC?

Red · « **Reply #46 on:** March 26, 2011, 08:35:14 PM »

He's meant to be HG'd into a hero as soon as possible. The EC should never block it's too risky. He may be an EC but if he blocks he's a big fat character with a good many identifiers.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #47 on:** March 26, 2011, 08:36:46 PM »

Quote from: Red on March 26, 2011, 08:35:14 PM

He's meant to be HG'd into a hero as soon as possible. The EC should never block it's too risky. He may be an EC but if he blocks he's a big fat character with a good many identifiers.

He should never block if you want to use him as a hero. If you want to use him as an EC, he should block. They wouldn't make an EC for the sole purpose of being a hero (excluding Proud Pharisee).

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #48 on:** March 26, 2011, 08:55:35 PM »

Any WC Philistine, also.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #49 on:** March 26, 2011, 09:08:08 PM »

Actually, it'd be better to do it on any philistine, since you don't want to shuffle the best card in the game in, and it'd follow the philly.

News:

Author Topic: Saul/Paul Reprint (Read 11068 times)

Warrior_Monk

browarod

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk