Author Topic: Proclaimed (Read 5933 times)

lightningninja · « **Reply #25 on:** October 01, 2010, 06:17:29 PM »

I do. I wasn't talking about pre-block ignore though. My deck activates lampstand in Herod's Temple, Altar of Dagon in Temple of Dagon, and Blue Tassels on the artifact pile. So in battle, you have to shuffle me or return me to territory.

Master KChief · « **Reply #26 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:27:42 PM »

so how do you activate dd then? also, discarding to ht for a chunk of ec's in territory will be devastating.

lightningninja · « **Reply #27 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:33:11 PM »

In my current deck I don't. People don't even run ET anymore, at least not at my tournaments.

Red · « **Reply #28 on:** October 01, 2010, 10:00:28 PM »

Quote from: lightningninja on October 01, 2010, 07:33:11 PM

In my current deck I don't. People don't even run ET anymore, at least not at my tournaments.

What has the current meta come to? We don't even run ET anymore.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #29 on:** October 01, 2010, 10:02:32 PM »

Quote from: lightningninja on October 01, 2010, 07:33:11 PM

People don't even run ET anymore, at least not at my tournaments.

What? He was the whole basis of COMBO COMBO COMBO COMBO CONGO!!!!

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #30 on:** October 01, 2010, 10:04:18 PM »

Actually Ittai was. ET wasn't really even needed for the noobsauce version, he was just the easiest to use.

Lamborghini_diablo · « **Reply #31 on:** October 01, 2010, 10:37:52 PM »

No, ET is just part of that super awesome combo where you use Gold Shield to convert him to purple so you can play AoCP before the opponent blocks.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #32 on:** October 02, 2010, 08:11:41 AM »

Quote from: lightningninja on October 01, 2010, 07:33:11 PM

In my current deck I don't. People don't even run ET anymore, at least not at my tournaments.

Well...that's weird. Aside from his preblock nastiness, he is the same brigade as the Disciples, and he can recur the best Herod's Temple fodder in the game: Philosophy (I think I have it in any deck I have with HT...the ability to save any NT character, Good or Evil, is awesome). I use him in at least three of my current decks.

lightningninja · « **Reply #33 on:** October 02, 2010, 02:32:33 PM »

I never thought of recurring fodder... that's a good point. =)

SomeKittens · « **Reply #34 on:** October 02, 2010, 06:09:11 PM »

Rarely would I want to recur fodder.

Master KChief · « **Reply #35 on:** October 02, 2010, 08:34:19 PM »

recurring 3 for any offense and 3 for any defense has rarely never proven useful. sir nobody used this to great effect in his last seasons deck.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #36 on:** October 02, 2010, 08:38:59 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 02, 2010, 08:34:19 PM

has rarely never proven useful.

Wait, what?

Master KChief · « **Reply #37 on:** October 02, 2010, 09:55:43 PM »

rarely. never. proven. useful.

browarod · « **Reply #38 on:** October 02, 2010, 10:06:55 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 02, 2010, 09:55:43 PM

rarely. never.

Adding full stops between does not negate the conflicting nature of the words.

Josh · « **Reply #39 on:** October 02, 2010, 10:40:10 PM »

Quote from: browarod on October 02, 2010, 10:06:55 PM

Quote from: Master KChief on October 02, 2010, 09:55:43 PM
rarely. never.
Adding full stops between does not negate the conflicting nature of the words.

As in, it is rare that it is never useful. So it is usually useful.

Master KChief · « **Reply #40 on:** October 02, 2010, 10:40:37 PM »

take 'never proven useful.' which means philosophy isnt useful. now take stick rarely in front. which means it rarely happens. is this really that hard to comprehend?

browarod · « **Reply #41 on:** October 03, 2010, 12:05:53 AM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 02, 2010, 10:40:37 PM

take 'never proven useful.' which means philosophy isnt useful. now take stick rarely in front. which means it rarely happens. is this really that hard to comprehend?

I never said I didn't understand what it meant, but you could have said it much more clearly.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #42 on:** October 04, 2010, 08:00:42 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 02, 2010, 10:40:37 PM

take 'never proven useful.' which means philosophy isnt useful. now take stick rarely in front. which means it rarely happens. is this really that hard to comprehend?

Yes. However, "useful" is much easier to say.

A good example of how this works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sShMA85pv8M

Master KChief · « **Reply #43 on:** October 04, 2010, 08:11:52 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on October 04, 2010, 08:00:42 PM

Yes. However, "useful" is much easier to say.

subjective. you're splitting hairs. does it even really matter to get my point across? the answer is no, btw.

browarod · « **Reply #44 on:** October 05, 2010, 01:20:02 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 04, 2010, 08:11:52 PM

Quote from: SomeKittens on October 04, 2010, 08:00:42 PM
Yes. However, "useful" is much easier to say.

subjective. you're splitting hairs. does it even really matter to get my point across? the answer is no, btw.

If he were splitting hairs, he would have pointed out that even in your explanation post of what "rarely proven useful" meant, you used an extraneous (and in this case, incorrect) word and also omitted a different word.

News:

Author Topic: Proclaimed (Read 5933 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

Lamborghini_diablo

browarod

browarod

browarod