Author Topic: Lost Soul (Hipster)  (Read 1703 times)

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Lost Soul (Hipster)
« on: July 13, 2012, 07:11:57 PM »
+1

Anti-hipster joking aside, I think this would be a super-good card. It's very powerful, but not overpowered since it's easily removed by SoG or Burial. The brigadeless bit is to ensure that FbtN LS doesn't negate it, but I Am Salvation does. It could also lead to Altar of Ahaz being played.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2012, 07:22:12 PM »
0
Not sure how I feel about it, but I will be honest, it is a very intriguing idea.  Couldn't you say "neutral" card though, for the special ability?

I feel like this kind of card (a neutral, not a particular character or something) is the method through which certain OP meta offenses should be stopped, since it can be used in all decks.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2012, 07:40:38 PM »
0
The reason I did brigadeless instead of neutral is just a hedge against fortresses or artifacts that could Negate it in the future.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2012, 09:44:59 PM »
0
The reason I did brigadeless instead of neutral is just a hedge against fortresses or artifacts that could Negate it in the future.

Or a SoG with a negate as has been discussed in the past?

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2012, 11:11:15 PM »
+1
Shh.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2012, 12:22:13 AM »
0
I don't think people (or at least myself) will think of doms.

I thought of the Dom idea even befor the FBTN soul.

I love the idea, especially because it will affect its owner as well!
I think it's a great cost to an awsome card.
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2012, 01:13:02 AM »
0
Another cool thing is that it can make Siege a battle-winner under the right circumstances, as well as False Peace if you opponent doesn't know it's in your deck and attacks with a band.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Minion of Jesus

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1106
  • The Wisconsonite, Seeking Retirement
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Lost Soul (Hipster)
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2012, 07:30:39 AM »
0
Weird... But pretty cool.
To the Pain!

-Wesley

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal