Author Topic: May 4th...and still no word on the new set? (Read 36703 times)

Aelec Enitnel · « **Reply #125 on:** May 09, 2011, 11:58:59 PM »

Can we PLEASE cut the "Yankee" talk!!!

lp670sv · « **Reply #126 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:00:50 AM »

Quote from: Aelec Enitnel on May 09, 2011, 11:58:59 PM

Can we PLEASE cut the "Yankee" talk!!!

Found a sox fan! All yankee fortresses must be ripped in half.

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #127 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:02:29 AM »

I'm not a Yankees fan, but to date, my favorite memory from Natz '10 is someone (I forget who) wearing a Yankee cap and getting yelled at by passing cars.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #128 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:06:03 AM »

Quote from: Aelec Enitnel on May 09, 2011, 11:58:59 PM

Can we PLEASE cut the "Yankee" talk!!!

Things get off-topic fast. One gets used to it, and learns to go with the flow.

Aelec Enitnel · « **Reply #129 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:06:54 AM »

That's the problem, I'm trying NOT to get used to it.

Korunks · « **Reply #130 on:** May 10, 2011, 08:50:11 AM »

Yeah this is currently the best spoilers thread we have for the new set, We had a sports forum created for sports discussion lets keep this on topic. Not everyone here likes when we spend 3 or 4 pages one something because then we seldom get back to the original topic. Some of us don't like the flow.

Aelec Enitnel · « **Reply #131 on:** May 10, 2011, 09:26:05 AM »

All of us don't like spam.

Ironica · « **Reply #132 on:** May 10, 2011, 11:29:47 AM »

I tried spam once and it wasn't that bad. Maybe you should try it again

.

Aelec Enitnel · « **Reply #133 on:** May 10, 2011, 11:37:04 AM »

I hate the "meat" spam

(Are amen smileys bad?)

TechnoEthicist · « **Reply #134 on:** May 10, 2011, 11:55:58 AM »

Quote from: Korunks on May 10, 2011, 08:50:11 AM

Yeah this is currently the best spoilers thread we have for the new set, We had a sports forum created for sports discussion lets keep this on topic. Not everyone here likes when we spend 3 or 4 pages one something because then we seldom get back to the original topic. Some of us don't like the flow.

Agreed, Moderators please remove everything not related to the new set in this thread...thanks.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #135 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:14:32 PM »

Quote from: TechnoEthicist on May 10, 2011, 11:55:58 AM

Quote from: Korunks on May 10, 2011, 08:50:11 AM
Yeah this is currently the best spoilers thread we have for the new set, We had a sports forum created for sports discussion lets keep this on topic. Not everyone here likes when we spend 3 or 4 pages one something because then we seldom get back to the original topic. Some of us don't like the flow.

Agreed, Moderators please remove everything not related to the new set in this thread...thanks.

*entire thread is deleted*

Bryon · « **Reply #136 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:25:56 PM »

Oh, give me a set
Where the gold cards are best
And the red cards will really see play.
Where decks may be seen
That are silver and green
And the cards are not white, orange or gray.

Aelec Enitnel · « **Reply #137 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:33:57 PM »

Gets you right here
*points to heart*

Cpt.Jaeger · « **Reply #138 on:** May 10, 2011, 12:55:21 PM »

Quote from: Bryon on May 10, 2011, 12:25:56 PM

Oh, give me a set
Where the gold cards are best
And the red cards will really see play.
Where decks may be seen
That are silver and green
And the cards are not white, orange or gray.

Sounds like a starter, but I really hope it isn't

TechnoEthicist · « **Reply #139 on:** May 10, 2011, 03:24:54 PM »

Quote from: Bryon on May 10, 2011, 12:25:56 PM

Oh, give me a set
Where the gold cards are best
And the red cards will really see play.
Where decks may be seen
That are silver and green
And the cards are not white, orange or gray.

I reiterate that good Green needs very little if anything at all. I'd rather see Blue make a comeback. More magicians for pale green would be nice though..but would we really see an expansion that does not encompass all colors?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #140 on:** May 10, 2011, 03:25:54 PM »

We would in a starter deck. Only 8 total.

browarod · « **Reply #141 on:** May 10, 2011, 05:25:11 PM »

If it is a Starter, I hope they really, really update the rulebook that comes with it.

Red · « **Reply #142 on:** May 10, 2011, 06:40:57 PM »

I've heard from many soruces it's not starters.

JSB23 · « **Reply #143 on:** May 10, 2011, 07:17:35 PM »

Quote from: Red on May 10, 2011, 06:40:57 PM

I've heard from many soruces it's not starters.

And with no citations or names this statement is completely worthless

SomeKittens · « **Reply #144 on:** May 10, 2011, 09:28:55 PM »

Quote from: browarod on May 10, 2011, 05:25:11 PM

If it is a Starter, I hope they really, really update the rulebook that comes with it.

And a few blank pages for new rulings.

Carl deuty · « **Reply #145 on:** May 10, 2011, 09:47:30 PM »

I can't wait for some new gold cards,bad gold or good gold? Any hints?

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #146 on:** May 10, 2011, 10:39:33 PM »

Yes, there will be good or bad gold. Maybe even some great gold!

Also, notice how the thread got back on topic organically? If you're wanting someone to

threads in this board for going off-topic, you'll have to appeal to my fellow mod. I much prefer to let threads run their course unless there is spam or forum rules are being broken.

lightningninja · « **Reply #147 on:** May 10, 2011, 10:40:19 PM »

Psh, we all know you're just waiting to abuse your power Pol.

Also, I am a nincompoop and my mother dresses me funny.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #148 on:** May 10, 2011, 10:53:48 PM »

Who, me? Never...

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #149 on:** May 10, 2011, 11:08:05 PM »

I don't think I've done a whole lot of moderation in this board - Ruling Questions is another matter, but I'm with Pol on this one. I'm pretty sure none of the gold in the set is bad

News:

Author Topic: May 4th...and still no word on the new set? (Read 36703 times)

lp670sv

Chronic Apathy

Ironica

browarod