Author Topic: Master Q's Card creations/ideas (Update 14, 3/30) (Read 11080 times)

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #50 on:** March 02, 2012, 07:44:48 AM »

Ark is rarely-if-ever worth a card slot, but I agree having up to X active would further promote actually using ST Priests.

Master Q · « **Reply #51 on:** March 03, 2012, 12:43:07 PM »

I'm thinking about changing ST again to say this: "When your Solomon's Temple Priest attacks, you may draw X or search opponent's deck or discard pile for a Lost Soul and put it in his territory."

This would eliminate the OPness of endless recursion of Silver Trumpets (which is a problem) and give it an edge over other themes, as this will now provide a means to always have access to LSs (barring Naz or Hez's Ring of course). Any objections to that change?

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #52 on:** March 03, 2012, 04:06:47 PM »

Looks good to me. That also encourages the use of Solomon for getting Glory out.

Seriously though, consider a limit on the number of arts which can be active at a time.

Master Q · « **Reply #53 on:** March 03, 2012, 11:48:14 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on March 03, 2012, 04:06:47 PM

Seriously though, consider a limit on the number of arts which can be active at a time.

I might decide to limit it to 2 or 3, but still don't think there are more than 3 worthwhile Temple Arts to make it matter.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #54 on:** March 04, 2012, 12:06:30 AM »

Quote from: Master Q on March 03, 2012, 11:48:14 PM

Quote from: BubbleBoy on March 03, 2012, 04:06:47 PM
Seriously though, consider a limit on the number of arts which can be active at a time.

I might decide to limit it to 2 or 3, but still don't think there are more than 3 worthwhile Temple Arts to make it matter.

Not yet...but a limit of X is more what I was thinking.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #55 on:** March 05, 2012, 09:29:20 PM »

Q on Mountain: Does it negate your copy?

Q on Sin Offering: If you play it during battle, does nothing happen at all?

I like Solomon Dedicates the Temple just fine.

Master Q · « **Reply #56 on:** March 05, 2012, 09:40:50 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on March 05, 2012, 09:29:20 PM

Q on Mountain: Does it negate your copy? Yes

Q on Sin Offering: If you play it during battle, does nothing happen at all? Correct

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #57 on:** March 05, 2012, 10:19:36 PM »

Quote from: Master Q on March 05, 2012, 09:40:50 PM

Quote from: BubbleBoy on March 05, 2012, 09:29:20 PM
Q on Mountain: Does it negate your copy? Yes

Q on Sin Offering: If you play it during battle, does nothing happen at all? Correct

In that case, I think both of those are a little UP. Or at least Mountain.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #58 on:** March 06, 2012, 01:21:37 AM »

Sin Offering could be made slightly more concise by using "shuffle this card" instead of "return this card to deck." I like all three of them, and the first two require a lot of strategy to use well, but Sin Offering would spawn a host of threads in the rulings question. It's not that it's worded improperly, but it has a very nuanced ability that may not be readily understood. I'd also get rid of its numbers so that Aaron/Zach/Jeremiah has an easier time getting initiative.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #59 on:** March 06, 2012, 08:06:10 AM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on March 06, 2012, 01:21:37 AM

I'd also get rid of its numbers so that Aaron/Zach/Jeremiah has an easier time getting initiative.

/Joiada/...Altar of Burnt Offering? Hm, that seems a bit OP now.

Yeah, I really really like the idea of Sin Offering, but it definitely will cause confusion.

Master Q · « **Reply #60 on:** March 08, 2012, 10:34:56 PM »

6th Group: False cards

Spoiler (hover to show)

*Should be half pale-green*

browarod · « **Reply #61 on:** March 08, 2012, 10:42:55 PM »

I'd prefer if False Dreams punished multi-brigade offenses rather than mono/dual-brigade ones.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #62 on:** March 09, 2012, 02:58:46 AM »

Those are pretty dang OP, but the art on the last to is superb!

Jmbeers · « **Reply #63 on:** March 09, 2012, 04:43:05 AM »

I noticed Sheperds makes itself CBN witch makes them plus household Idols a repeatable autoblock.

Quote from: browarod on March 08, 2012, 10:42:55 PM

I'd prefer if False Dreams punished multi-brigade offenses rather than mono/dual-brigade ones.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #64 on:** March 09, 2012, 09:34:00 AM »

Finally, I'd get to use the "other ability" on Bartholomew.

Master Q · « **Reply #65 on:** March 30, 2012, 12:15:45 PM »

7th Group: Remaining Sons o' Jacob

Naphtali

Spoiler (hover to show)

Gad

Spoiler (hover to show)

Issachar

Spoiler (hover to show)

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #66 on:** March 30, 2012, 04:00:58 PM »

Love all those.

Jmbeers · « **Reply #67 on:** April 01, 2012, 11:16:57 PM »

They are all very good but not too good,

Nap kills Mayhem

I do think Gad should be when discarded yada yada though.

Arrthoa · « **Reply #68 on:** April 02, 2012, 12:02:39 AM »

If they are made then that will make Leah more useful since She's the mom of Rueban, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulan, and Issachar that would be six good Gen Heroes she searches for, and Rachel searches for the other two useful Sons.

I like all of them and hope they are printed with similiar abilities. Maybe you could make a Dinah card (the only known daughter of Jacob)

Master Q · « **Reply #69 on:** April 02, 2012, 12:22:58 AM »

Quote from: Arrthoa on April 02, 2012, 12:02:39 AM

Maybe you could make a Dinah card (the only known daughter of Jacob)

If I were to make Dinah, this is what it'd be:

"If captured, add your Son of Jacob to the battle to negate an Evil or neutral card. Cannot be interrupted." (X= # of your Sons of Jacob)

But I would probably leave a Dinah reprint to those more skilled than I.

sepjazzwarrior · « **Reply #70 on:** May 16, 2012, 08:52:19 AM »

I really like all of the cards, however I don't think that I would use Gad. If was was using a hand-discard Genesis deck I may use him, but the Genegyptians won't really use him because he doesn't help you win the battle so much or help speed

Arrthoa · « **Reply #71 on:** May 16, 2012, 09:15:57 AM »

Quote from: sepjazzwarrior on May 16, 2012, 08:52:19 AM

I really like all of the cards, however I don't think that I would use Gad. If was was using a had-discard Genesis deck I may use him, but the Genegyptians won't really use him because he doesn't help you win the battle so much or help speed

Gad is useful cause even if you loss you could take the character that your opponent blocked you with

sepjazzwarrior · « **Reply #72 on:** May 16, 2012, 10:06:02 AM »

but i don't plan on losing with Genegyptians cause it's a speed deck and losing even just 1-2 RA could mean a lost game

News:

Author Topic: Master Q's Card creations/ideas (Update 14, 3/30) (Read 11080 times)

browarod