Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
I got a love hate thing going with tower of babel. It discourages single colored offenses, but its ability is pretty cool. I might change it from "Play" to owners territory. That way someone won't get owned because they are using the same offense as you.I was thinking of making it owner's territory, but wasn't sure. Thanks for the confirmation ^_^Nameless demon is... confusing very confusing on how you could reveal your bottom card while drawing from the top? Also doesn't the shuffling sort of kill orange's theme of place on bottom?The shuffling was only so that you couldn't abuse this by banding the same demon from bottom of deck into battle over and over again. I can remove that if you don't think it's necessary.Nameless angel (Angel with a secret name;) )is also odd, because his ability only activates if he is IN battle.Yeah, that was the problem I had with his effect. I'm thinking of adding a "For remainder of game, " to the beginning of his effect so he just has to enter battle once and then he can do the set aside stuff.Angelic swiftness needs to say (Minimum 1 turn set aside) or else I could do ANY one turn set aside instantly.Yes! I forgot that part. Thanks.
Entrap the Parisees is awful. That card would be in every speed deck. I like the idea of making no-SA LS's viable, but that's just too powerful. You could try a non-TC EE that says "place all non-SA LS beneath owners' decks" or something like that.Eh, I didn't want to make it a copy of Death of Unrighteous. But, I suppose I could at least rethink the idea.For Angel w/ Secret Name, couldn't you have an identifier that says "SA activates from set-aside"? That would make the wording able to be a little smoother.Fixed.For Tower of Babel, wouldn't you want to affect EC's, not heroes?Er, why?I have to say, I really just don't like the Nameless Demon. It's way too complicated, and it doesn't seem like it would be that helpful.It was mostly just a random idea I had, not necessarily anything game breaking. I'm very much a complicated effect kind of guy .
Quote from: BubbleBoy on February 02, 2010, 08:38:42 AMFor Tower of Babel, wouldn't you want to affect EC's, not heroes?Er, why?
For Tower of Babel, wouldn't you want to affect EC's, not heroes?
Quote from: browarod on February 02, 2010, 08:42:22 AMQuote from: BubbleBoy on February 02, 2010, 08:38:42 AMFor Tower of Babel, wouldn't you want to affect EC's, not heroes?Er, why?Well, it was an evil act...I would think most of the people involved were evil...I like accurate abilities...
Quote from: BubbleBoy on February 02, 2010, 08:50:25 AMQuote from: browarod on February 02, 2010, 08:42:22 AMQuote from: BubbleBoy on February 02, 2010, 08:38:42 AMFor Tower of Babel, wouldn't you want to affect EC's, not heroes?Er, why?Well, it was an evil act...I would think most of the people involved were evil...I like accurate abilities...What's not evil about the ability?
In its current editing, it could cause your opponent to consistently lose whatever color defense he/she planned on playing...interesting..both card ideas are very interesting indeed.
as for entrapping, I would make it protect from rescue except by heroes with no SA.