« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: A dominant everyone can agree on:  (Read 6152 times)

Offline CJSports

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #25 on: September 14, 2010, 03:00:57 PM »
0
Geese guys this is all my fault i thought it was third john not second my bad but the question now is there a card from second john.
Logged
Life is not a promise but eternity is...

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #26 on: September 14, 2010, 03:15:49 PM »
0
Quote from: CJSports on September 14, 2010, 03:00:57 PM
Geese guys this is all my fault i thought it was third john not second my bad but the question now is there a card from second john.

No. Second John is the only book of the Bible with no current Redemption cards. I'm pretty sure it's been that way ever since Obadiah was printed.
Logged
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Ninja Duck

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
  • Ninja Duck of the Lord
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2010, 09:33:29 PM »
0
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
Logged

Offline The Warrior

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2407
  • Resident of The Internet.
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2010, 09:34:40 PM »
0
Quote from: Ninja Duck on September 14, 2010, 09:33:29 PM
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
still wouldnt work
Logged
Wanderer of the Web.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2010, 09:37:17 PM »
0
Quote from: Ninja Duck on September 14, 2010, 09:33:29 PM
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
NJ would still be useful. You could play it with Presented before the Lord, or discard it to get rid of Sin in the Camp or Confusion of Mind.
Logged

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2010, 09:43:48 PM »
0
DOMINANT: RING WRAITH
EVIL
SA: THIS CARD HAS NO EFFECT.
IDENTIFIERS: DOES NOT COUNT AS A CARD FOR GAME OR DECK BUILDING PURPOSES.
Logged

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2010, 09:45:54 PM »
0
Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on September 14, 2010, 09:43:48 PM
DOMINANT: RING WRAITH
EVIL
SA: THIS CARD HAS NO EFFECT.
IDENTIFIERS: DOES NOT COUNT AS A CARD FOR GAME OR DECK BUILDING PURPOSES.
spam. that card is the same as the one posted at the beginning of this here thread.

does that mean I'm meaningless?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal