Author Topic: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?  (Read 5768 times)

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #25 on: August 25, 2011, 02:31:26 PM »
0
Speed is still the biggest problem. If one player is playing a fast deck, then his opponent needs a fast deck to stand a chance. It's a vicious cycle.
I'm almost in agreement on this, except I actually think (just my opinion) that Dominants are the biggest problem.  An unstoppable game changing card with absolutely no cost that can be played at any time in any deck.  So yes, the first person to draw those cards will always have the advantage.  Take dominants out of your/our decks (like most booster draft), and watch how much more fun the game becomes.

Incidentally, what was the least amount of dominants in the top decks this year?  (Serious question - I have not looked.)  Is it even remotely possible for a non-dominant deck to compete?

If you consider a 'standard' compliment of Dominants to be 11 (Son of God, New Jerusalem, Grapes of Wrath, Angel of the Lord, Harvest Time, Guardian of Your Souls, Destruction of Nehustan, Burial, Christian Martyr, Falling Away and Mayhem)

Then Matt was running the full 11.
I was running with 9 (No Grapes, No Mayhem)
Andrew played two decks, one of which I believe contained a full set, his other main deck had significantly less, I belive no NJ, Burial, Falling Away or Guardian.
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2011, 02:32:54 PM »
0
You are kidding right? A fast defense would break the game. If Pharisees had more power, they would absolutely break the game. Their speed is balanced by their relative long game weakness.

I was for the most part agreeing with you and just adding my thoughts.

Westy had either 6 or 7 dominants I think.

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #27 on: August 25, 2011, 03:13:49 PM »
0
You are kidding right? A fast defense would break the game. If Pharisees had more power, they would absolutely break the game. Their speed is balanced by their relative long game weakness.
I don't mean deck out in 4 turns. I just mean a few more drawing power to the slower defenses.
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #28 on: August 25, 2011, 03:18:28 PM »
0
With the new cards, Babs are "kinda" fast.  Egyptians are incredibly fast, but plagued with some of the problems that Phars have.  (At least they protect from convert and discard in the same card)
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #29 on: August 25, 2011, 03:28:50 PM »
0
You are kidding right? A fast defense would break the game. If Pharisees had more power, they would absolutely break the game. Their speed is balanced by their relative long game weakness.
I don't mean deck out in 4 turns. I just mean a few more drawing power to the slower defenses.

Defenses already have some speed. Egyptians have several draw characters and two draw enhancements. Babs have two draw enhancements. Brown has a draw enhancement. Almost every defense has some form of search.

Offline Isildur

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4775
  • Mr. Deacon
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #30 on: August 25, 2011, 03:29:49 PM »
0
Quote
In my opinion, the BIGGEST problem in redemption is speed. You can have a giant defense, but if you don't draw faster than the opponents offense, you're sunk. I feel we need to focus primarly on shutting down mass drawing, as that turns the game into a race rather than the fun back and forth fights of old.

I agree with this fully this is the biggest difference between how the game used to play out years ago and how the game plays now.
3 Prophets Packs ftw

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #31 on: August 25, 2011, 05:00:05 PM »
0
It would be interesting to play a test game, where someone uses a deck that took top 10 at nats, except you just ignore all draw abilities on cards for the game... See how well that deck does without drawing.

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #32 on: August 25, 2011, 06:28:26 PM »
0
I would bet not well at all.

I think another thing is to make defenses more fun. I know from experience that although I do very well with defense heavy decks (better than offense heavy), it's not as fun waiting for your opponents to attack you. It's much more fun to have a deck that is constantly drawing cards and keeping up a large hand to give you options. If making defense-heavy decks have more benefits for both competitiveness and fun, I think it could be more balanced.
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #33 on: August 25, 2011, 06:30:29 PM »
0
It would be interesting to play a test game, where someone uses a deck that took top 10 at nats, except you just ignore all draw abilities on cards for the game... See how well that deck does without drawing.

Draw abilities? Or Abilities that add cards to my hand after the draw phase? Susanna is still a top notch troll for speed if you only take out drawing.
www.covenantgames.com

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #34 on: August 25, 2011, 06:34:40 PM »
0
It would be interesting to play a test game, where someone uses a deck that took top 10 at nats, except you just ignore all draw abilities on cards for the game... See how well that deck does without drawing.

Draw abilities? Or Abilities that add cards to my hand after the draw phase? Susanna is still a top notch troll for speed if you only take out drawing.
And especially with me using A-Bomb. I don't care about drawing cards, but I want them to draw cards...if it's just my hand, that's fine.

Offline Bobbert

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1773
  • The player formerly known as Thomas Hunter
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #35 on: August 25, 2011, 11:48:42 PM »
0
It would be interesting to play a test game, where someone uses a deck that took top 10 at nats, except you just ignore all draw abilities on cards for the game... See how well that deck does without drawing.

What happens if I have Hur? You have to draw back up to 8...
ANB is good. Change my mind.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2011, 12:02:01 AM »
0
It would be interesting to play a test game, where someone uses a deck that took top 10 at nats, except you just ignore all draw abilities on cards for the game... See how well that deck does without drawing.

What happens if I have Hur? You have to draw back up to 8...

For the sake of experimentation, you cant make yourself draw except in the draw phase. How's that work?

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2011, 12:03:37 AM »
0
So Mayhem's a dead card?
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2011, 12:16:48 AM »
0
It would just be a more drastic test to see how different the game is without speed.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Are the OP cards and later counters intentional, or unexpected?
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2011, 12:20:08 AM »
+1
It would just be a more drastic test to see how different the game is without speed.

If you want an accurate test then let two players build decks without draw cards. To make one player use a deck full of draw cards but not allow them to work is grossly unfair to that player. It's not very hard to beat anyone who has several dead cards in their deck.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal