Author Topic: Alternative Dominants  (Read 1707 times)

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Alternative Dominants
« on: January 13, 2012, 04:20:42 PM »
+2
Here are some Dominants that wouldn't increase the total number of doms in a deck, but could provide some variety among niche decks.



I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2012, 04:27:13 PM »
0
Printing new versions of existing Dominants is a really cool idea! Thanks for sharing, Pol! :)
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2012, 04:28:48 PM »
0
I think that Burial might be even better for speed decks now though.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2012, 04:29:38 PM »
+1
I don't know about the Son of God and New Jerusalem, but I love the Burial, and I love the idea as a whole. It's hard to believe I haven't seen this mentioned before.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2012, 04:31:25 PM »
0
I don't know about the Son of God and New Jerusalem, but I love the Burial, and I love the idea as a whole. It's hard to believe I haven't seen this mentioned before.
A while ago, there was some discussion about this sort of thing, I don't remember who came up with it.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Smokey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2012, 12:25:37 PM »
0
Dat Burial.

Offline Ryupeco11

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 369
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2012, 02:42:20 PM »
0
i like the ideas of the cards but i'm curious about the new jerusalem one. don't most forts  hold cards based on their identifiers? if so having them lose those identifiers would mead they couldn't hold any cards right? also would the "special ability becomes..." part of it mean the fort loses its original ability?
-Nodnarb Dude!(A.K.A. "the copy Kat Ninja!")

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Alternative Dominants
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2012, 05:26:35 PM »
0
For NJ, the Fortress looses its old ability. There is no precedent for cards losing Identifiers, but the way I imagined it is that if a card looses a "holds" identifier, the cards it was holding go back to their default locations. One of the side-benefits I envisioned was being able to get back all your cards from Storehouse at once at the cost of losing further use of it and not being able to negate your opponents' Fortresses.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal