« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire  (Read 3148 times)

Offline ArmedKevin117

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
    • -
    • Northeast Region
A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« on: December 15, 2018, 03:49:46 PM »
0
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."
Logged

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2018, 10:20:01 PM »
0
Quote from: ArmedKevin117 on December 15, 2018, 03:49:46 PM
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."
Usage nit:  I think you mean "Precludes (card)"
Logged

Offline ArmedKevin117

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2018, 08:54:56 PM »
0
Quote from: EmJayBee83 on December 15, 2018, 10:20:01 PM
Quote from: ArmedKevin117 on December 15, 2018, 03:49:46 PM
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."
Usage nit:  I think you mean "Precludes (card)"

That works too... probably better.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal