Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: Red Wing on September 17, 2011, 12:37:02 PM
-
Diotrephes 3/5 Crimson EC
SA: May set aside a NT Evangelist for two turns. May search deck for a site and place a NT Lost Soul there. May band to a heretic. If Diotrephes is discarded, place it beneath deck instead.
III John 9-10
Identifiers: Heretic
Hymenaeus 4/5 Crimson EC
May band to Alexander. Return NT Evangelists to Territory. Discard this character if Paul enters the field of play. May select two heroes in territories to fight each other.
Identifiers: Heretic
Alexander 4/5 Crimson EC
Discard this character if Paul enters the field of play. Look at the top X cards of deck. May add one NT Site or Evil card to hand. Place the rest beneath deck.
Identifiers: Heretic, X is the number of NT sites in play.
Divisions in the Church X/3 Crimson/Black EE
If used by a NT EC, Interrupt the battle and return one NT human hero (except an evangelist) to territory. Then, select another NT human Hero to fight that Hero.
Identifiers: Involves Heresy, X= the number of Heretics in Play.
What do you think?
-
Overall, OP and a little wordy. Just take off a few clauses and they should be good.
-
They deserve to be OP, theres been like 10 sets already or so, and yet only 3 heretics.
-
Overall, OP and a little wordy. Just take off a few clauses and they should be good.
What's overpowered? Like Knot a Blonde said, there only a few heretic cards.
-
If anything, Diotrephes is OP because he helps Creeper so much. Heretics won T2 at nationals, so it's not like they're unused.
-
If anything, Diotrephes is OP because he helps Creeper so much. Heretics won T2 at nationals, so it's not like they're unused.
Ok I can see how he is overpowered. I edited it to say if diotrephes is discarded place beneath deck. Better?
-
A lot better. The rest are ok, I'd change "ignore" to "Return to territory" otherwise, one doesn't want to give infinite inish. Unless they change the rules, that is.
A side point, who'd be the NT authors? We assume the authors of some books (Like Luke wrote Acts) but not all are guaranteed.
-
A lot better. The rest are ok, I'd change "ignore" to "Return to territory" otherwise, one doesn't want to give infinite inish. Unless they change the rules, that is.
A side point, who'd be the NT authors? We assume the authors of some books (Like Luke wrote Acts) but not all are guaranteed.
Well, Paul for sure. I'd imagine that Luke could included as well. Matthew, Mark, and John too. That's all I can think of.
-
Timothy. Edgar Allen Poe. Buffalo.
-
A lot better. The rest are ok, I'd change "ignore" to "Return to territory" otherwise, one doesn't want to give infinite inish. Unless they change the rules, that is.
A side point, who'd be the NT authors? We assume the authors of some books (Like Luke wrote Acts) but not all are guaranteed.
Well, Paul for sure. I'd imagine that Luke could included as well. Matthew, Mark, and John too. That's all I can think of.
Those aren't the people I'd be worried about. The problem is that we don't know for sure every author of the NT, and there are some books (Hebrews) that we have no idea who the author is. Luke, Paul, Apollos and Priscilla/Aquila have all been considered. What qualifies one to be a NT author?
-
That's just not a good identifier to bring into the game. Go with "Evangelist" or something.
-
That's just not a good identifier to bring into the game. Go with "Evangelist" or something.
Thats a good idea. Edited.