Author Topic: Type 1-2 Player Unofficial Banlist (Read 82597 times)

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #100 on:** July 11, 2011, 02:06:14 AM »

Huh. I was pretty sure he didn't use any dominants in his Sin in the Camp deck in 2009, but I can't find that deck list anywhere.

EDIT:

O SNAP SON I FOUND IT. Isn't this the same deck Gabe used? Hah! I was right for once.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?

Gabe · « **Reply #101 on:** July 11, 2011, 08:31:23 AM »

Quote from: Captain Kirk on July 11, 2011, 12:44:30 AM

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on July 11, 2011, 12:31:03 AM
That Gabe guy won nats without SOG.

When?

With Clift's (RTSManiac's) Speedcamp deck at CA Nats in 2009. You, Kirk, are the guy who took down Tyler for me to let me slide into 1st place. Thanks for that.

Smokey · « **Reply #102 on:** July 11, 2011, 03:56:54 PM »

On a more on-topic note, for those of you who wish to remain part of the banlist pleace make sure you post a game summary and your nominations for this testing period.

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on July 11, 2011, 02:06:14 AM

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #103 on:** July 12, 2011, 02:37:01 PM »

Any reason why my post was deleted?

Smokey · « **Reply #104 on:** July 12, 2011, 05:05:34 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 12, 2011, 02:37:01 PM

Any reason why my post was deleted?

The one about Iron Pan is still there, unless you're referring to something else.

Ironica · « **Reply #105 on:** July 12, 2011, 05:50:13 PM »

A successfully fun type that had a ban list was NW style (banned all doms). Whatever happen to it?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #106 on:** July 15, 2011, 12:37:11 AM »

Quote from: Smokey on July 12, 2011, 05:05:34 PM

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 12, 2011, 02:37:01 PM
Any reason why my post was deleted?

The one about Iron Pan is still there, unless you're referring to something else.

I made a joke about Gabe looking like Jesus. Apparently that's not allowed here?

Quote from: Ironica on July 12, 2011, 05:50:13 PM

A successfully fun type that had a ban list was NW style (banned all doms). Whatever happen to it?

It's still around. I still haven't seen a full list of rules for that. I think the decks have to be balanced too.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #107 on:** July 15, 2011, 07:30:56 PM »

Type NW has a LOT of other rules. This is for people that like T1, but just want to enjoy a more diverse and strategic meta that banning certain cards brings.

I have not played this period because I have been without internet at my house for a while. I can only get on at work, and I can't download RTS here.

Smokey · « **Reply #108 on:** July 15, 2011, 07:49:36 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on July 15, 2011, 07:30:56 PM

Type NW has a LOT of other rules. This is for people that like T1, but just want to enjoy a more diverse and strategic meta that banning certain cards brings.

I have not played this period because I have been without internet at my house for a while. I can only get on at work, and I can't download RTS here.

Two week testing periods, new one hasn't started yet.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #109 on:** July 16, 2011, 02:28:29 PM »

Wow, has it not been two weeks? Time is crawling for me!

Smokey · « **Reply #110 on:** July 16, 2011, 02:32:53 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on July 16, 2011, 02:28:29 PM

Wow, has it not been two weeks? Time is crawling for me!

In two days next testing period starts.

I am dissapoint in members who haven't posted a game report / bans for this week.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #111 on:** July 16, 2011, 02:41:39 PM »

Give it some time. Usually when these things are set up, three people sign up and one person updates, so we're already doing better than usual.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #112 on:** July 16, 2011, 03:01:25 PM »

I haven't built a deck yet Smokester. Care to play a game tommorow?

Smokey · « **Reply #113 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:17:15 PM »

Updated with current testing period and bans.

Alex_Olijar didn't have time to post a game report yesterday, but since he gave me his feedback and bans I'll allow him to stay a member for now

.

Red · « **Reply #114 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:21:55 PM »

chariot of fire? lolwut? That card is balanced.

Smokey · « **Reply #115 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:24:40 PM »

Quote from: Red on July 19, 2011, 04:21:55 PM

chariot of fire? lolwut? That card is balanced.

Quote

Be respectful of other people's opinions, please no commenting on nominations.

Thread rule.

Quote

Chariots of Fire
This card is included in practically every deck as a way to extend offense past the point of no return. In combination with cards like Asher and Micah, or even things such as Herod's Temple, it allows a deck to go on practically forever. As much as I like doing that, any card that finds its way into every deck needs to be taken down a notch.

Arch Angel's reasoning.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #116 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:32:50 PM »

Yeah, I played, and I sucked.

I agree with Chariot - there's other ways to recur heroes anyway now, so it's not as needed imo.

Red · « **Reply #117 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:39:42 PM »

Without discussion this thing will get nowhere. Pokemon discusses any pokemon they wish to make uber(Ban) so what's wrong with discussion?

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #118 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:42:19 PM »

Quote from: Red on July 19, 2011, 04:39:42 PM

Without discussion this thing will get nowhere. Pokemon discusses any pokemon they wish to make uber(Ban) so what's wrong with discussion?

What's discussive about saying "lolwut? That card is balanced"?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #119 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:43:15 PM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 19, 2011, 04:32:50 PM

I agree with Chariot - there's other ways to recur heroes anyway now, so it's not as needed imo.

I agree with this, but how does that translate into banhammering?

Smokey · « **Reply #120 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:44:25 PM »

Quote from: Red on July 19, 2011, 04:39:42 PM

Without discussion this thing will get nowhere. Pokemon discusses any pokemon they wish to make uber(Ban) so what's wrong with discussion?

I said commenting, not discussing.
The way you worded it sounded like you were saying "What noob would want that banned?"

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 19, 2011, 04:32:50 PM

Yeah, I played, and I sucked.

I agree with Chariot - there's other ways to recur heroes anyway now, so it's not as needed imo.

I agree, but I want to considering how it will impact the game first, maybe play some practice games without it against defensive decks.
This also brings Unholy Writ into question.

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 19, 2011, 04:43:15 PM

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 19, 2011, 04:32:50 PM
I agree with Chariot - there's other ways to recur heroes anyway now, so it's not as needed imo.
I agree with this, but how does that translate into banhammering?

You could like... read the OP... or something.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #121 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:45:37 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 19, 2011, 04:43:15 PM

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 19, 2011, 04:32:50 PM
I agree with Chariot - there's other ways to recur heroes anyway now, so it's not as needed imo.
I agree with this, but how does that translate into banhammering?

Overcentralization. Every deck with <3 or >7 heroes, and many in between, use it. Because of it's breaking potential + the huge use, it's ban worthy. It also effectively sub bans several single hero strats that probably warrant attention anyway. Two birds with one stone.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #122 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:48:22 PM »

So it's certainly useful, but I don't see it as "broken." There are too many ways to get rid of it. (And lots of people are packing non-DoN anti-art thanks to Lampy)

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #123 on:** July 19, 2011, 07:41:03 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 19, 2011, 04:48:22 PM

So it's certainly useful, but I don't see it as "broken." There are too many ways to get rid of it. (And lots of people are packing non-DoN anti-art thanks to Lampy)

Not in type ban. There's no Falling Away, which is the number 1 reason to carry lampy. Some might still carry it for burial, but that's not nearly as good as before and thus will see less play.

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #124 on:** July 19, 2011, 09:36:05 PM »

Chariot is a strong card, but IMO, it is no where near strong enough to be banned. The only card I wouldn't mind banned is NJ. Everything else is fine. Yes Mayhem first turn, but you also have to put down as much as you can leaving them vulnerable. NJ is the only worthy nominee.

News:

Author Topic: Type 1-2 Player Unofficial Banlist (Read 82597 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

Ironica