Author Topic: So I played MTG the other day... (Read 16717 times)

SomeKittens · « **Reply #25 on:** September 04, 2010, 11:00:02 AM »

Not sure about deckbuilding ones, but we could steal a page from FF:TA's playbook, and randomly choose some of the gameplay +#/-# every game.

+1 Can't Touch This: Win three battles with immunity
+1 NERD!: Reference Firefly, Dr. Who, Star Wars, Star Trek, Battlestar Galatica and XKCD during table talk. (Yes, this has happened)
+3 Questing: Rescue 2 LS with converted EC's
-1 Too easy: Win 5-0
+1 Solitaire: Lose 5-0
+2 Mimetime: Complete a battle where both players don't say a word
+2 Redemption: The Musical: Complete a battle where both players communicate only through song
+1 Zombie: Return a hero from the discard pile to play twice (Heal doesn't count)
+1 Why?: Win a battle challenge standing on one leg
+1 Taking Sides: Start two side battles
-2 NPE: Win two battles without letting your opponent play a card

Quote from: JSB23 on September 03, 2010, 02:31:29 AM

(goes into the fetal position)
healing spells shouldn't be holy, healing spells shouldn't be holy, healing spells shouldn't be holy

But then it's useless against zombies

Professoralstad · « **Reply #26 on:** September 04, 2010, 12:45:46 PM »

Hint: If you're making a post with a bunch of +1's, check the "Don't use smileys" box under Additional Options.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #27 on:** September 04, 2010, 01:13:31 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 04, 2010, 12:41:59 AM

I'm much less excited about this than I was at first. It seems that everyone is wanting to neuter the possibilities of how points are awarded/deducted as much as possible. What's wrong with points for deck content? Or even if that's out (I can at least see where you're coming from), why all the hating on points that deal with specific cards? Shouldn't the nature of the beast be that you alter your deckbuilding to account for the fact that you're playing a different type? People don't use the same deck for Multi and 2-Player and Teams...

I completely agree.

I don't wanna use the same deck as I do for t1 on this format.

JSB23 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 04, 2010, 02:23:57 PM »

The nerd one is way OP I would get it like every game

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #29 on:** September 04, 2010, 02:28:15 PM »

Quote from: JSB23 on September 04, 2010, 02:23:57 PM

The nerd one is way OP I would get it like every game

Only when your age is one less than a multiple of 3.

*Blip* Nerd Achievement Unlocked *Blip*

SomeKittens · « **Reply #30 on:** September 04, 2010, 10:42:24 PM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 04, 2010, 12:41:59 AM

I'm much less excited about this than I was at first. It seems that everyone is wanting to neuter the possibilities of how points are awarded/deducted as much as possible. What's wrong with points for deck content? Or even if that's out (I can at least see where you're coming from), why all the hating on points that deal with specific cards? Shouldn't the nature of the beast be that you alter your deckbuilding to account for the fact that you're playing a different type? People don't use the same deck for Multi and 2-Player and Teams...

Exactly. This is supposed to be n00b-friendly, and slightly wacky if I have any say.

Master KChief · « **Reply #31 on:** September 05, 2010, 01:20:01 AM »

Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on September 04, 2010, 02:28:15 PM

Quote from: JSB23 on September 04, 2010, 02:23:57 PM
The nerd one is way OP I would get it like every game
Only when your age is one less than a multiple of 3.

*Blip* Nerd Achievement Unlocked *Blip*

heh, thats exactly what this reminded me of...xbox achievements.

jtay · « **Reply #32 on:** September 05, 2010, 01:39:54 AM »

I'm liking the list so far, keep the ideas coming. I think it still needs something having to do with fortresses. I was thinking of giving a point for having 5 or more characters placed in fortresses and calling it "Hide and Seek," but considering how many forts allow more than I wasn't sure. I think there's still a few other categories that haven't been covered in the list (healing and set aside come to mind). Also some of the names I came up with aren't very interesting, so make some suggestions for those too.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #33 on:** September 05, 2010, 02:44:04 AM »

Quote from: jtay on September 05, 2010, 01:39:54 AM

I'm liking the list so far, keep the ideas coming. I think it still needs something having to do with fortresses. I was thinking of giving a point for having 5 or more characters placed in fortresses and calling it "Hide and Seek," but considering how many forts allow more than I wasn't sure. I think there's still a few other categories that haven't been covered in the list (healing and set aside come to mind). Also some of the names I came up with aren't very interesting, so make some suggestions for those too.

If you have 3 or more occupied forts?

jtay · « **Reply #34 on:** September 05, 2010, 03:08:47 AM »

Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on September 05, 2010, 02:44:04 AM

If you have 3 or more occupied forts?

Ooh! I like that!

lightningninja · « **Reply #35 on:** September 05, 2010, 03:39:28 PM »

Enter battle with a face-down card -- Flashlight Tag

The Warrior · « **Reply #36 on:** September 05, 2010, 05:56:25 PM »

+ 1
Friendly Fire-Discard A Hero and a EC with the same Card
Its Quiet...Too Quiet-dont make a rescue attempt for 3 turns
Empty Alley- dont draw lost souls for 2 turns

+2
Retreat!-withdraw 3 times this game
Submarine- win a battle with a Hero that was face down this turn

5+
Machine Gun-Discard all Characters in opponents territory by the end of turn
Mind Reader-look at opponents hand 4+ times this game
Lone Ranger-Win the game with one hero in battle and none in territory
Necropost-make opponent mad by bringing a card from discard pile back into the field of play

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #37 on:** September 05, 2010, 06:06:58 PM »

Mind reader is way too easy. U+T

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #38 on:** September 05, 2010, 06:12:07 PM »

Machine Gun could be done a lot in an early game.
Necropost would be pretty easy too, depending on how 'mad' is defined.
Retreat would be easy also, but its okay beings it would cost 3 rescues.

The Schaef · « **Reply #39 on:** September 05, 2010, 06:37:47 PM »

We should remember these so we can start compiling aggregate scores and unlock achievements for people when the game gets released on XBLA.

The Warrior · « **Reply #40 on:** September 05, 2010, 06:45:18 PM »

1-
FBTN- nuff' said
You still have 2 left- win with a Sog and NJ
Use a dominant-nuff' said

5-
Modern Warfare-have no Card Older than Apostles
Modern Warfare 2-have no cards older than Angel Wars
TGT-More Than nuff' said

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #41 on:** September 05, 2010, 07:26:52 PM »

The Modern Warfare cards will never come into play. The Big Four doms are all pre-Apostles.

The M · « **Reply #42 on:** September 06, 2010, 06:07:26 PM »

+3
UNDERDOG: Win a battle with egyptians and judges.
CREATION: Play ANB more than 3 times in a game.
BUCKLER: nuff said.
GOTCHA: Bluff your opponent at least twice in a game.
FBTN: nuff said gain.
GOOD ENOUGH: Use an AOC.
COMBOCOMBOCOMBO : Use a combo on your opponent more than 3 times. (No, SoG and NJ aren't a combo)
FOOL ME ONCE...: Use the same combo on your opponent twice.
LAST MAN STANDING: Make a successful block with an evil character that has been protected from a discard ability before the battle.
WHIMPER: Make your opponent cry. This bonus doubles if your opponent is male.
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST: have no characters in play except those that are at least 10/10. this cannot be done on your first turn.

jtay · « **Reply #43 on:** September 06, 2010, 06:25:19 PM »

Someone really needs to fill me in on what all this obsession with buckler is all about.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #44 on:** September 06, 2010, 06:38:26 PM »

Quote

UNDERDOG: Win a battle with egyptians and judges

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #45 on:** September 06, 2010, 06:55:05 PM »

Quote from: The M on September 06, 2010, 06:07:26 PM

WHIMPER: Make your opponent cry. Then, feel bad and give her a GOYS.

I hate changing a post and then posting fix'd, and I -1 everyone I see do it.... but I just had to for Wild Bill's sake.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #46 on:** September 06, 2010, 07:04:23 PM »

+2 Master, Padawan: Teach your opponent something new.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #47 on:** September 07, 2010, 01:21:43 AM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on September 06, 2010, 07:04:23 PM

+2 Master, Padawan: Teach your opponent something new.

YES YES YES YES

lightningninja · « **Reply #48 on:** September 07, 2010, 03:10:48 PM »

If I beat Gabe, can I then be granted teaching him something new: how to lose?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #49 on:** September 07, 2010, 03:12:05 PM »

I don't think that's possible.

News:

Author Topic: So I played MTG the other day... (Read 16717 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

The Schaef

Rawrlolsauce!