Author Topic: So I played MTG the other day...  (Read 16712 times)

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
So I played MTG the other day...
« on: September 03, 2010, 01:46:45 AM »
+6
I went to a local MTG get-together the other day with a friend.  He taught me how to play a while ago, and he loaned me a deck to play with.  Long story short, the whole affair wasn't too fun, but I did get an idea out of it.  The style everyone was playing was called EDH (Elder Dragon Highlander), which, as I understand it, is supposed to encourage casual play.  The most notable quality of this style that I noticed was the way points were awarded to the players.  There was a printed list of things that you could do in-game that would earn you more points toward your score, and I found some of them to be pretty hilarious.  I can't remember any specific ones, but here's a couple not-so-hilarious ones that I found on the internet:

+2 Bonuses:
Blackjack - Control two creatures whose total power is exactly 21.
Near Death experience - Be at 1 life with an empty stack.
Got Your Back - Save an opponent from taking lethal damage.

There were also some penalties:

-2 Penalties:
But We Just Started - Eliminate a player before their fifth turn.
Don't Pass Go - Take more than two turns in a row.

I think it would be cool if people played Redemption with similar obscure goals in mind.  Here's a few ideas off the top of my head:

Have one of several obscure/unused artifacts discarded by your opponent.
Play two or more enhancements with no special ability in a battle.
Reenact an epic battle from the Bible (e.g. David vs. Goliath).

I'm sure other people could come up with more interesting ideas than these.  Then all you have to do is assign point values and humorous titles to each of these and you're good to go!  I figure you can tally points in addition to lost soul scores to see who comes out on top at the end of the tournament.  Even if no one actually does this, I would love to see what kinds of quirky (and not so quirky) things you would award points for.
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2010, 01:54:41 AM »
0
Oh man, this idea is so cool! I'm in love <3

I'd say 1 point for each LS rescued and 3 points for winning as a base (that way, you're still playing to win and get a 4+ point advantage over your opponent), and add the extra rules onto that. Such as:

-2 for playing Son of God
+2 for not having New Jerusalem in your deck
+2 for playing an Enhancement with no Special Ability on a character with no special ability
+2 for having a Lost Soul with no Special Ability in a deck with no FbtN LS
-2 for winning a battle without playing any Enhancements and playing a Dom

And so on and so on. This could be the most fun way to play the most fun card game.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2010, 02:09:52 AM »
0
Oh man, this idea is so cool! I'm in love <3

I'd say 1 point for each LS rescued and 3 points for winning as a base (that way, you're still playing to win and get a 4+ point advantage over your opponent), and add the extra rules onto that. Such as:

-2 for playing Son of God
+2 for not having New Jerusalem in your deck
+2 for playing an Enhancement with no Special Ability on a character with no special ability
+2 for having a Lost Soul with no Special Ability in a deck with no FbtN LS
-2 for winning a battle without playing any Enhancements and playing a Dom

And so on and so on. This could be the most fun way to play the most fun card game.
Would these points be added to win scores or to LS diff?
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2010, 02:21:50 AM »
0
It'd be entirely different since it wouldn't be official. The winner of the game is determined by whoever has the most points. So Johnny could easily beat Spike. For example, using just these rules, player A could win 5-1 and still lose if he played SoG/NJ and won a battle with AotL and CM, while his opponent didn't have NJ in his deck. Now, if player A had not used CM to win a battle, it would have been a tie (since it would have been 5-2 but he wouldn't have been docked 2 points). So it is extremely difficult to win if you're not using a good deck and get blown out of the water LS-wise, but at the same time, if you disregard the extra rules and just run a Nationals-level deck with no modifications, you'll probably lose.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2010, 02:26:12 AM »
0
reminds me of the final fantasy tactics gameboy games, where each level/battle had a random set of laws, and if one of your characters broke a law, the judge would come and remove that character from battle and throw him in jail. :)
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2010, 02:28:18 AM »
+2
New rule: if you use TGT you go to jail.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline JSB23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3197
  • Fun while it lasted.
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2010, 02:31:29 AM »
0
reminds me of the final fantasy tactics gameboy games, where each level/battle had a random set of laws, and if one of your characters broke a law, the judge would come and remove that character from battle and throw him in jail. :)
(goes into the fetal position)
healing spells shouldn't be holy, healing spells shouldn't be holy, healing spells shouldn't be holy
An unanswered question is infinitely better than an unquestioned answer.

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2010, 02:46:31 AM »
0
I like your list.  I don't think points should be deducted for having a card (NJ) in your deck though, but only if you use it.  I like the balance that comes with your idea; if you win by playing SoG/NJ, then the points you gain from the win are eliminated by the use of SoG/NJ.
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2010, 02:48:16 AM »
0
Although it can be worth it to grab the +3 for winning.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline egilkinc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2010, 06:01:40 AM »
0
New rule: if you use TGT you go to jail.

Nice!

How 'bout -5 for playing Falling Away.

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2010, 01:54:08 PM »
+1
Okay, so I've got some time to come up with some of these.  Some will be based on a list of EDH Victory points I found, some will be based on what others have already said, and some will be original.  All bonuses are assuming a Type 1 Multi-player game is being played.  Here we go.

+1 Bonuses
Can't Touch This - Win 3 battles with immunity.
Empty Alley - Draw no lost souls for 3 or more turns in a row.
Evenly Matched - End 2 or more battles in a stalemate.
Friendly Fire - Discard a hero and an evil character at the same time.
Hide and Seek - Have 3 or more occupied forts in play or set-aside area.
Indiana Jones - Have 4 or more artifacts active at one time.
It's Quiet... Too Quiet - Don't make a rescue attempt for 3 or more turns.
Juggernaut - Win 2 battles in the same battle phase with the same character.
Lay Down Your Life - Rescue a soul via mutual destruction.
Luck of the Draw - Win a battle on turn one.
Mind Reader - Look at (or reveal) opponent's hand 3 or more times.
Nail Biter - Win the game by only one lost soul difference.
Pumped Up - Permanently increase one of your character's abilities by 5/5 or more.
Spiritual Revival - Convert 3 or more evil characters.
Strength in Weakness - Win a battle with a character that has no special ability.
Thief! - Use an opponent's own enhancement against him.
Totally Legit - Win the game with a rescue attempt.
Turncoat - Use an opponent's own character against him 2 or more times.
Vendetta - Discard, shuffle, or otherwise remove one of an opponent's characters from play 2 or more times during a game.
War Party - Have 3 or more weapon class enhancements (of the same alignment) in play.
What's in a Name? - Receive a name-on-name bonus 2 or more times during the game.
Yeah I gots numbrs - Defeat a Fight by the Numbers character by the numbers.
? - Win a battle challenge in which at least one hero and one evil character participate.

+2 Bonuses
Bases Loaded - Have at least one hero or evil character from every brigade in your territory.
Battle Royale - Win a battle in which 3 or more heroes and 3 or more evil characters participate.
Got your Back - Save an opponent from losing a battle.
I Gotta Hand it to You - End a battle with zero cards in your hand.
Old School - Win a battle by playing a single-color enhancement with no special ability.
Retreat! - Withdraw from battle 3 or more times in a game.
Slave Trader - Have 5 or more heroes in your land of bondage.
Slow and Steady - All opponents deck out before you.
Submarine - Win a battle with a character that was previously face down this turn (not in draw pile).

+3 Bonuses
Destroyed Evidence - End the game with zero cards in your discard pile.
Historical Accuracy - Re-enact a battle from the Bible with the actual characters that were involved.  (Both players receive the bonus.)
Lone Ranger - Win the game with one hero in battle and no heroes in territory.
Questing - Rescue 2 lost souls with a converted evil character.


-1 Penalties
Win a battle with Angel of the Lord
Win a battle with Christian Martyr
Play Falling Away
Remove 3 or more of an opponent's characters from play at one time

-2 Penalties
Play Son of God
Play New Jerusalem

I'll probably come up with more later, and I'll add others as people mention them.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2010, 06:17:55 PM by jtay »
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2010, 02:18:59 PM »
0
I like your list.  I don't think points should be deducted for having a card (NJ) in your deck though, but only if you use it.  I like the balance that comes with your idea; if you win by playing SoG/NJ, then the points you gain from the win are eliminated by the use of SoG/NJ.
I agree. Points should be awarded for playing, not deck building.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2010, 04:39:41 PM »
0
+1 Bonuses
Luck of the Draw - Win a battle on turn one.
This should be a -1.

+2 Bonuses
Old School - Win a battle by playing a single-color enhancement with no special ability.
This should be worth +5 or something.  It would mean that someone actually put an enhancement like this in their deck (which is tough enough) AND that they are actually able to use it at the right time to win a battle (amazingly hard).

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2010, 04:52:28 PM »
0
-50
STAMP: Redeem a demon

+50
Nice Guy:You may allow your opponent to mulligan at the beginning of the game. If he decides to, you get the points.

Offline Daniel TS RED

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
  • If God be for us...
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2010, 04:53:04 PM »
0
This is a sweet idea.  I'd be all for playing some games like this.  You guys should come up a top 25 for +'s and -'s and agree upon the #'s, so decks can be put together and game can be played.

Daniel

 ;D
My Teams: Atlanta Braves, NY Giants, Miami Hurricanes Football, Duke Basketball, Cleveland Cavs

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2010, 05:28:10 PM »
0
+1 Bonuses
Luck of the Draw - Win a battle on turn one.
This should be a -1.

+2 Bonuses
Old School - Win a battle by playing a single-color enhancement with no special ability.
This should be worth +5 or something.  It would mean that someone actually put an enhancement like this in their deck (which is tough enough) AND that they are actually able to use it at the right time to win a battle (amazingly hard).

I don't want to punish someone for getting a lucky draw.  Besides, if it were -1, the defending player's best option would be to not defend, since he would get a -1 score if he did successfully defend and the score would balance out if he let the hero win.

As for the second one, I want to keep the numbers reasonably small, preferably with an absolute value of 3 or less since that's how it is in MTG.  Or at least keep in three tiers.  I figure +1's can be achieved by adding a few cards to the deck, +2's with carefully planned deck building, and +3's should depend on both players' decks.  The actual amounts could be adjusted (to, say, +1, +3, +5) if balance is an issue.
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2010, 06:13:01 PM »
0
Strength in weakness + 1
Use a character with no special ability

Slow and steady + 2
Deck out your opponent

I gotta hand it to you + 2
Your opponents hand reaches 0 after all special abilities have resolved.

Slave Trader + 2
Have 7 or more heroes in your land of bondage

Biblical correctness + 1
Block with a Hero with a fitting evil character (David Vs Goliath, John the Bap vs Salome/Herod ant/herodias etc.)

Who needs a theme? + 2
Play a deck with no central theme (Strategies are allowed).

It's over 9000! + 3
Win a game (Within time limits) with a 153 deck.

Playing CM - 1
(Nuff said)

Playing AOTL -1

Playing Nj - 2

Playing Falling away - 1

Doubt yourself + 3
Win a battle with doubt (via enhancement or #s. Just like Pot's wife)

Buckler -2/+2
Cuz its Buckler.

Name on Name + 1
Play a name on name bonus.

Biblical Correctness + 1
Play a Non Name on name card that is part of that character story (Jawbone/Samson)

I hate Rainbows - 2
Have more than 4 brigades of one alignment in play.

No more heroes + 1
After your opponent is decked, leave him/her with no heroes in territory for three turns.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2010, 07:29:05 PM »
0
I added a few of yours to the list.  Some were (pseudo)duplicates which I left off and others were modified slightly.  I particularly liked Slave Trader, though 7 seemed a bit high.

I'm sorry that my choices seem so subjective.  If I didn't add one of yours to the list that you think I should have, by all means call me out on it.

Here's a few explanations:
It's Over 9000 and Who Needs a Theme? - I'd rather not award points based on deck content.
No More Heroes - It seems like you would have to suffer the -1 penalty for removing >3 characters from play at a time in order to get this achievement.  Something about that doesn't seem right.
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #18 on: September 03, 2010, 07:35:57 PM »
0
I can understand deck content, I just like encouraging weird decks.  For Doubt I'd really suggest 2 or more. First off you have to USE doubt (which doesn't happen often) Then you have to get init (0/12, good luck) and not get negated/itb+ Bw'd
« Last Edit: September 03, 2010, 07:39:08 PM by TheKarazyvicePresidentRR »
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2010, 07:44:04 PM »
0
Block with Doubt and use Gates to bring in KoT. 10/24 BTN.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2010, 07:44:30 PM »
0
Block with Doubt and use Gates to bring in KoT. 10/24 BTN.
Is giving up your fort worth + 1?
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2010, 08:03:44 PM »
0
I'm thinking of this in a t2 sense where I have 3 gates. Yes, it is worth it. I used demons all of last year and there was rarely a time I would end up using all 3 gates.

You could also use Doubt + Unholy Writ.

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #22 on: September 03, 2010, 08:16:12 PM »
0
I hate to be Debbie Downer over here... but I want to express some of the flaws I see so that this could be really fun (Love the idea!)

1. There's WAY too much about deck building. Bonuses that require lame cards like doubt and no special ability cards I think just encourage people to make stupid decks just so that they can win in points. I think it would be very much more fun to have two national competitor decks that try to do rediculous things, such as:

1. Win 3 battle challenges or more -- Tyrant (+2)
2. Win the game by 1 lost soul -- Defense! (+1)
3. Discard TGT -- People's Champion (+2 for every player in the game, including yourself)
4. Win the game with a rescue attempt -- Starder Deck N00B
5. Win a battle challenge and a rescue attempt in one battle phase -- Juggernaut
6. Use Buckler -- Buckler Brigade! (+3) (yeah, this is based on deck building but it's buckler)  ;D

I just think that these types of abilities would be a LOT more fun, so that people can take their awesome decks and then mess around with each other.
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline jtay

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 517
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #23 on: September 03, 2010, 09:00:33 PM »
0
I think that one of the defining characteristics of a different style of play is that it requires a different style of deck.  I admit that it would be interesting to see high tier decks face off with these different methods of obtaining points, but the purpose of this style of play, just as it is in MTG, should be to promote casual play.

I can certainly see where you're coming from, though.  Even when I formed the idea, I was sure that this style (if it ever caught on) would likely be doomed to the same fate that MTG's EDH had already met.  The part of my little story that I left off was what exactly went on at the MTG league meet that I went to.  Despite the spirit of the style, some people were bringing decks that they could use to milk as many points out of the system as possible before winning in a manner that was just short of receiving penalties.  I hoped that Redemption's mechanics might work better with this spirit than MTG's did.

I also agree with you about awarding points for doing things with certain cards (Doubt, TGT, etc.), and am considering removing the one from my list regarding Doubt.  This seems just short of awarding points for deck content.  And I don't think "stupid decks" should be an issue.  You can only build in so many ways to gain points before your deck becomes unable to perform well, in which case you would likely lose.  The trick is finding the right combination of cards that is most likely to generate the most points while still maintaining functionality.

That said, I'm going to add a few of your suggestions to the list, and remove the Doubt one.
Epic pouting maneuver!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So I played MTG the other day...
« Reply #24 on: September 04, 2010, 12:41:59 AM »
+2
I'm much less excited about this than I was at first. It seems that everyone is wanting to neuter the possibilities of how points are awarded/deducted as much as possible. What's wrong with points for deck content? Or even if that's out (I can at least see where you're coming from), why all the hating on points that deal with specific cards? Shouldn't the nature of the beast be that you alter your deckbuilding to account for the fact that you're playing a different type? People don't use the same deck for Multi and 2-Player and Teams...
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal