Author Topic: Type C? (Read 3357 times)

TheJaylor · « **on:** June 30, 2012, 02:52:45 PM »

We should have a "Type C" where everyone only uses characters and Lost Souls, no enhancements, artifacts, forts, sites, dominants or anything but characters and Lost Souls.

Nameless · « **Reply #1 on:** June 30, 2012, 03:02:37 PM »

At first glance I thought that would be a terrible idea, but it might actually be fun. We should try it at Regs.

TheJaylor · « **Reply #2 on:** June 30, 2012, 03:05:12 PM »

Alright, build yourself a deck and we can try it out. Anyone else going to NC Regs. is welcome to join us during free-time and stuff.

Nameless · « **Reply #3 on:** June 30, 2012, 04:50:05 PM »

Will do.

Redoubter · « **Reply #4 on:** June 30, 2012, 08:10:01 PM »

It may seem interesting, but there is no way it would work. You'd have Offensive Band Chain. Can you get your defense bigger? Nope? Well, here's your Soul sir. Oh, I can get bigger? You lose and won't ever get through.

Without enhancements, beyond the initial banding you can't affect the battle, and therefore it won't actually work. You'll either automatically win each battle once you get your FBTN banding out and have Ahimelek ready to go for Goliath.

Like the idea, but it doesn't work with a game like Redemption

TheJaylor · « **Reply #5 on:** June 30, 2012, 11:58:57 PM »

Quote from: Redoubter on June 30, 2012, 08:10:01 PM

It may seem interesting, but there is no way it would work. You'd have Offensive Band Chain. Can you get your defense bigger? Nope? Well, here's your Soul sir. Oh, I can get bigger? You lose and won't ever get through.

Without enhancements, beyond the initial banding you can't affect the battle, and therefore it won't actually work. You'll either automatically win each battle once you get your FBTN banding out and have Ahimelek ready to go for Goliath.

Like the idea, but it doesn't work with a game like Redemption

What about TFG, KoT, and defensive banding chains? I'm sure Spirit of Temptation->Gomer->King Manasseh->Fallen Angel->Lying Spirit->Lot's Wife->Wandering Spirit->Panic Demon/Obsidion Minion chain could get pretty high. I know you won't exactly have all those but still, without enhancements, you can definitely do some damage. Against a Warrior-class banding chain you can do the old school philistine banding chain and end with Garrison or something. There's plenty of options with defense that FBtN banding offenses wouldn't expect to normally see, making it more fun and challenging.

Redoubter · « **Reply #6 on:** July 01, 2012, 12:40:00 AM »

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on June 30, 2012, 11:58:57 PM

Quote from: Redoubter on June 30, 2012, 08:10:01 PM
It may seem interesting, but there is no way it would work. You'd have Offensive Band Chain. Can you get your defense bigger? Nope? Well, here's your Soul sir. Oh, I can get bigger? You lose and won't ever get through.

Without enhancements, beyond the initial banding you can't affect the battle, and therefore it won't actually work. You'll either automatically win each battle once you get your FBTN banding out and have Ahimelek ready to go for Goliath.

Like the idea, but it doesn't work with a game like Redemption
What about TFG, KoT, and defensive banding chains? I'm sure Spirit of Temptation->Gomer->King Manasseh->Fallen Angel->Lying Spirit->Lot's Wife->Wandering Spirit->Panic Demon/Obsidion Minion chain could get pretty high. I know you won't exactly have all those but still, without enhancements, you can definitely do some damage. Against a Warrior-class banding chain you can do the old school philistine banding chain and end with Garrison or something. There's plenty of options with defense that FBtN banding offenses wouldn't expect to normally see, making it more fun and challenging.

If you actually have that good of a defensive band, then congratulations you just stopped all rescues. Period. Especially since you have no Wall of Protection and each player would steal the opponent's banding chain. Now no one can get through, and no enhancements, fortresses, or artifacts can help you get past that. All games would time out if defense actually does what you described, with no one being able to rescue 5.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #7 on:** July 01, 2012, 07:05:14 AM »

The games probably wouldn't last long, but I think there would be enough strategy in deckbuilding choices to be at least mildly interesting. I'd say it might be worth a try.

Chris · « **Reply #8 on:** July 01, 2012, 01:02:54 PM »

I was under the impression we already had something pretty similar to this. I think it's called "Type 1".

Red · « **Reply #9 on:** July 01, 2012, 02:05:43 PM »

This is about as deep as the mud puddle in my back yard.

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: Type C? (Read 3357 times)

TheJaylor

Type C?

Nameless

Re: Type C?

TheJaylor

Re: Type C?

Nameless

Re: Type C?

Redoubter

Re: Type C?

TheJaylor

Re: Type C?

Redoubter

Re: Type C?

Professoralstad

Re: Type C?

Chris

Re: Type C?

Red

Re: Type C?