Colors Don't Matter

[Warrior_Monk]

I wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.

because being able to draw 4 cards (Archer + anybody w/ Namaan's Chariot and 2k Horses) followed by Gib's Trick, Wonder's Forgotten, Forgotten History, and Haman's Plot isn't a problem?

Make up your mind, is the offense or the defense broken?

both. ET beats it though, obviously.

[TheKarazyvicePresidentRR]

XD If they are both broken then it is okay!

[New Raven BR]

ok i need to start this bzck up, what changes can be made to make this type much more balanced?

[jbeers285]

Honestly I'm not sure this idea is feasible with current redemption cards

I like it but it would basically require its own new cards

Just Evil and Good cards

A brand new game as whole would be cool though

[New Raven BR]

Honestly I'm not sure this idea is feasible with current redemption cards

I like it but it would basically require its own new cards

Just Evil and Good cards

A brand new game as whole would be cool though

actually it wouldn't require its own card, this is a redemption play type idea much how type 1 type 2 type a and such are, this is somewhat a unique play type that is good for beginners and the idea is to just use enhancements n heroes regardless of what color they ar hence the name "colors don't matter" cause in this type, colors really don't matter

[TheKarazyvicePresidentRR]

As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.

[New Raven BR]

As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.

is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?

[Minister Polarius]

Then it will return to Warriors-era FbtN domination.

[Warrior_Monk]

Then it will return to Warriors-era FbtN domination.

CBP and CBI cards could still be good.

[New Raven BR]

ok, people really didn't answer my question 

As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.

is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?

[Asahel24601]

If you fear ET, use DD or Wasting Disease.

I believe this type has potential; as the combos on offense get ridiculous, the combos on defense get ridiculous. ET whatever draw your whole deck is all well and good, but what happens when he's blocked by a Reheboam from hand who wrecks havoc on you with his own offensive cards, plays Mayhem, Confusions your SoG, and plays whatever else he wants with the tons of initiative you afforded him with your books?

i just found a thread with RR's take on it
but i think it was my idea first and so i improved alot on it and here it is

Type CDM

Dominants: No Dominants

[New Raven BR]

If you fear ET, use DD or Wasting Disease.

I believe this type has potential; as the combos on offense get ridiculous, the combos on defense get ridiculous. ET whatever draw your whole deck is all well and good, but what happens when he's blocked by a Reheboam from hand who wrecks havoc on you with his own offensive cards, plays Mayhem, Confusions your SoG, and plays whatever else he wants with the tons of initiative you afforded him with your books?

i just found a thread with RR's take on it
but i think it was my idea first and so i improved alot on it and here it is

Type CDM

Dominants: No Dominants

actually having no dominants is very much needed cause the type will be completely broken with no dominants cause you have so many battle winners in the game and as if the game wasn't broken enough as it is with the CDM type, dominants don't help it be less broken but more on the lines of making it even more broken. take it from me, i don't need to change that rule it's fine how it is and it's balancing the type out by restricting dominants to prevent game brokage. any "other" suggestions to help balance out the type?

[EmJayBee83]

As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.

is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?

Just have an additional rule that states that CBN (and the old-timey CBPIorN) is the same as CBP.

Then it will return to Warriors-era FbtN domination.

Voila', problem solved.

[New Raven BR]

As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.

is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?

Just have an additional rule that states that CBN (and the old-timey CBPIorN) is the same as CBP.

you mean just play cannot be negated as cannot be prevented? sounds a lil more balanced. hmm, ok we'll make that a rule

[New Raven BR]

rules have been updated

[New Raven BR]

wow! its been a year or two since I checked this out. this style could be better played now more then then. anyone have any suggestions on how we can improve this type? im looking to make this type playable and popular and possibly make this an official type

[wmd1999]

ANB off treasurer pre-block 

[Prof Underwood]

ANB off treasurer pre-block 

This is just one example of why I don't think this format could really work.  When designing cards we often pick colors specifically to avoid game-breaking problems.

[Red]

ANB off treasurer pre-block 

This is just one example of why I don't think this format could really work.  When designing cards we often pick colors specifically to avoid game-breaking problems.

I can do ANB preblock anyway. I'm more scared of a Samson's Sacrifice plus hidden treasures.

[TheHobbit13]

Why et acop does the same thing accept its much better?

[Red]

Why et acop does the same thing accept its much better?

Because forts/Sites would be SCARY.

[Professoralstad]

Samson's Sacrifice can only be played by a Judge to use its ability, and there are only two Judges that I am aware of that are not Gold, and both have been reprinted to be in Gold and have been made better that way (Jephthah and Jair). So it wouldn't be a problem. Especially not with HT, since neither Jephthah or Jair are prophets, nor are they green.