Author Topic: The Hobbit  (Read 10267 times)

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #25 on: January 01, 2012, 04:23:37 PM »
0
Oh. Yeah. 3D.

-runs away crying-
C'mon.  That would be one of the only justifiable reasons for absolutely gratuitous 3D.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #26 on: January 01, 2012, 04:29:57 PM »
0
I can't see in one eye. 3D does nothing for me.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #27 on: January 01, 2012, 04:44:06 PM »
0
I can't see in one eye. 3D does nothing for me.
Oh.  Apologies.  I totally didn't mean it that way.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #28 on: January 01, 2012, 04:45:10 PM »
0
I'll forgive you in time, despite my running and crying and such.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #29 on: January 01, 2012, 04:50:30 PM »
0
Hey, at least you got exercise!  Don't forget to hydrate.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2012, 12:37:15 PM »
0
Have you read the books? I will agree they were good movies in and of themselves, but they did not live up to the standard Tolkien set.

Before you ask examples, one word: Bombadil.
Butchered is nowhere near the right word. Bombadil was cut because it would have been at least a 15 minute scene in a 3 hour long movie that doesn't actually have anything to do with the plot itself. As much as I love Tom Bombadil, it was not prudent that it remain in the movie, even the extended edition. As far as book-to-movie transitions go, Lord of the Rings is actually extremely faithful. Yes, they had to cut and change things, but that was to make the movies more cinematic, especially in Return of the King.
Though I also say butchered isn't the right word, I was disappointed. Tom Bombadil also reappears in Return of the King, IIRC. I was more disappointed with Saruman dying early and there being no scourging of the shire. That was the best part of the entire book.

Offline Bobbert

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1773
  • The player formerly known as Thomas Hunter
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2012, 07:40:10 PM »
0
I was more disappointed with Saruman dying early and there being no scourging of the shire. That was the best part of the entire book.

That's the second biggest complaint :( At any rate, the trailer looks good. Is it bad that I've already noticed three deviations from the book?
ANB is good. Change my mind.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal