Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Quote from: Watchman on October 12, 2018, 02:18:17 PMQuote from: sepjazzwarrior on October 12, 2018, 01:36:15 PMI'm assuming this would let you look at their hand and chose the good card?Correct. They streamlined the wording that took out wording like “look at opponent’s hand and...” If it gave the choice to the opponent then it would be specifically worded as such.And if you think about it, we already use an implied "Look at opponent's deck..." for abilities like the EE discard on Hidden Treasures, etc.
Quote from: sepjazzwarrior on October 12, 2018, 01:36:15 PMI'm assuming this would let you look at their hand and chose the good card?Correct. They streamlined the wording that took out wording like “look at opponent’s hand and...” If it gave the choice to the opponent then it would be specifically worded as such.
I'm assuming this would let you look at their hand and chose the good card?
The natural feeling of regret might overcome you if you betrayed a friend.Spoiler (hover to show)
could you chose to underdeck a good dom in play or does it have to be from their hand?
And regrets can also an opponent's evil human I assume?
Quote from: Master Q on October 08, 2018, 03:09:38 PMI've never known anyone who's wanted to use all the beasts in the same deck. That's five brigades...You're only thinking like a completive player. There are far more people that play Redemption for fun. Some of them will enjoy putting all the beasts into a deck (I happen to be one of them) without having them all discard one another. Rather than have all Daniel decks look the same, it will be possible to build at least 3 different defenses to use with Daniel Heroes (Babylonians, Persians and beasts/demons).
I've never known anyone who's wanted to use all the beasts in the same deck. That's five brigades...
Quote from: Gabe on October 12, 2018, 03:03:08 PMThe natural feeling of regret might overcome you if you betrayed a friend.Spoiler (hover to show)Discard 3 of an opponent's cards? Yeah, that doesn't seem OP...
The last two spoilers of the day will come from John later tonight but his work schedule has pushed those back a bit. Most changes and tweaks that we're making to the previewed cards will be revealed all at once when the images I finalized. There's simply too much going on to keep those updated here. While we're waiting I thought I'd share an update with you an update to Hannah to tie her to Samuel.Spoiler (hover to show)P.S. The image for Regrets has also been updated to reflect a stat change.
Spoiler (hover to show)
As for Zechariah:Zechariah SA: If you control another minor prophet negate characters (and enhancements if you control another temple priest) in battle (except star cards)So I read it this ability would be:If you control another minor prophet negate characters in battle (except star cards) , If you control another temple priest negate enhancements in battle (except star cards)I would assume this would be correct??
Can you see the writing on the wall?Spoiler (hover to show)
Slightly disappointed Guardian didn't get to spoil that one. I can't find his old card idea thread but didn't that version let the opponent pick a card to discard or something like that instead of being random? I'm not too opposed to the randomness on the player has a pretty good amount of control over it but I liked the design of it being opponent's choice.Edit: Would it be possible to add "up to X" instead of "X"? A smaller number will actually be better in a lot of cases since you'll probably want keep some cards safe from the discard and it feels a little weird for a Babylonian synergy card to actually punish you for playing lots of Babylonians.