Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Quote from: Watchman on October 08, 2018, 05:06:10 PMBut as it stands it can target evil OT human prophets (such as Balaam). The wording would need to be changed to “your good OT human prophet.”I'm not sure I see a problem with it rescuing evil prophets. They're lost souls who need rescuing just as much as the characters depicted in actual Lost Soul cards do.
But as it stands it can target evil OT human prophets (such as Balaam). The wording would need to be changed to “your good OT human prophet.”
Quote from: Watchman on October 08, 2018, 05:06:10 PMAnd something to throw out for discussion, would it be better or worse if “negate” is added to the rescue?I don't see any harm in doing that, but what would be the point of adding that?
And something to throw out for discussion, would it be better or worse if “negate” is added to the rescue?
Quote from: Kevinthedude on October 08, 2018, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: Watchman on October 08, 2018, 05:06:10 PMBut as it stands it can target evil OT human prophets (such as Balaam). The wording would need to be changed to “your good OT human prophet.”I'm not sure I see a problem with it rescuing evil prophets. They're lost souls who need rescuing just as much as the characters depicted in actual Lost Soul cards do.Lost souls they may be, but if they’re unrepentant people who don’t have faith in God they don’t get redeemed, they get judged. And by the way Elijah was translated, in line with how Enoch was translated, these were faithful, God-fearing prophets. To rescue an evil human without any sense of repentance and faith in God is the antithesis of God’s plan of salvation.
You didn't think we were going to make you use the old Elisha did you?Spoiler (hover to show)
Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on October 08, 2018, 07:58:19 PMYou didn't think we were going to make you use the old Elisha did you?Spoiler (hover to show)Finally, a playable Elisha! Good job, guys. I’m thinking the wording should be “you may reveal a hand: shuffle revealed evil dominants.” It could be argued that it can target all evil dominants in play (such as Doubt or evil Three Woes) based upon the wording. But maybe with the : it is specifying the evil dominants in the revealed hand (which, obviously, is the intent). Just a thought.
So it works like this? You reveal a hand and shuffle the dome, if you dont shuffle any dims, you can discard the evil card, right?
Quote from: sepjazzwarrior on October 08, 2018, 09:47:58 PMSo it works like this? You reveal a hand and shuffle the dome, if you dont shuffle any dims, you can discard the evil card, right?Correct. All other actions are reliant upon the hand reveal. It’s worded so that you can reveal your own if you really want to.
Quote from: Gabe on October 08, 2018, 09:56:37 PMQuote from: sepjazzwarrior on October 08, 2018, 09:47:58 PMSo it works like this? You reveal a hand and shuffle the dome, if you dont shuffle any dims, you can discard the evil card, right?Correct. All other actions are reliant upon the hand reveal. It’s worded so that you can reveal your own if you really want to. Sometimes you just need CBN enhancements and I can know when my hand has an Evil Dominant, especially one that's not terribly relevant at the moment, but my opponent might not have one, or might do a silly thing like protect their hand.
That’s exactly why we made him this way.
Quote from: Watchman on October 07, 2018, 05:05:07 PMI’m in support of TTB without Unity.Why? It's a no-cost battlewinning ability. Why would that not have some restriction?
I’m in support of TTB without Unity.
Will there be any legacy rares spoiled anytime soon? Speaking from a business perspective, I definitely need to know soon what those are for a particular reason. From a player side, it would just be cool to know what they will be.
Verifying you mean they won’t be spoiled until all of the 129 phase 1 cards have been spoiled?
**EDIT** Chariot of Fire (and the spoiler image) have been updated to include "good".
Quote from: Gabe on October 09, 2018, 11:19:21 AM**EDIT** Chariot of Fire (and the spoiler image) have been updated to include "good".I am wondering if there is an issue with the wording in Chariot. How can you be attacking and control no heroes? The REG definition (stated below) seems to make this impossible.Attack When the active player begins a battle against another player, the active player attacks that player. The player they are attacking is being attacked, the defender, and their opponent. See Defend. Only the characters that begin the battle attack, but all characters in battle controlled by the attacking player are also attacking, in addition to rescuing or taunting, if applicable. No characters are attacking in a side battle. A player may only be attacked once per Battle Phase.