Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Now entering the ring:

Spoiler (hover to show)

It should be noted that we are looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make sure the Hero icon on Naaman is more of a reminder than an actual icon

Nice, looks great and gives me hope for a Nergalsharezzar legacy rare.

New Naaman makes me happy. I may have to play Syrians this year just for that.

Now entering the ring:

Spoiler (hover to show)

It should be noted that we are looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make sure the Hero icon on Naaman is more of a reminder than an actual icon

Can we please move away from the whole “Limit once” wording? This generates a lot of ambiguity and questions as it does not specify WHEN it is being limited. Better options are pre-existing wording such as “limit once per game,” “limit once per round,” or “limit once per turn.” It’s more intuitive to specify when it is being limited, thus preventing any confusion.

The next spoiler for today is...

Spoiler (hover to show)

For a legacy rare I prefer different card art but that would affect T1 deck building, which would allow the FooF version and the LR to be in the same deck, which may be too much.

Can we please move away from the whole “Limit once” wording? This generates a lot of ambiguity and questions as it does not specify WHEN it is being limited. Better options are pre-existing wording such as “limit once per game,” “limit once per round,” or “limit once per turn.” It’s more intuitive to specify when it is being limited, thus preventing any confusion.

"Limit once" means "Limit once while this card remains in play".  That's why you can use the ability again if the card is reset via shuffle, return to hand, etc.

The space saved on text is why they've made the election to use the wording "Limit once".  Shortcuts like this are scattered throughout Redemption abilities, like "Each upkeep" meaning "Once during your upkeep" and "Each turn" meaning "Once during your turn".

It's up to the Redemption player to memorize these shortcuts.

Justin meant well, but those are not the 2 Bears that will be making a reappearance.

Spoiler (hover to show)

No, since she is unique, the brigade would need to change in order to run different versions.

Now entering the ring:

Spoiler (hover to show)

It should be noted that we are looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make sure the Hero icon on Naaman is more of a reminder than an actual icon

Looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make the Hero icon into a reminder than an actual icon...

Would this mean in the future certain cards like The Roman jailer , King of Nineveh will no longer be considered dual icon cards???

 For cards like Covenant of Eden that "negate other dual icon cards"??



 For deck building requirements for type 2 I guess the legacy rare Naaman would be considered a "Neutral card".

Guess we now have an evil card Naaman (tin sets) and a Neutral card Naaman (legacy rare) for type 2 deck building purposes.

Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on February 13, 2019, 01:53:09 PM

Now entering the ring:

Spoiler (hover to show)

It should be noted that we are looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make sure the Hero icon on Naaman is more of a reminder than an actual icon

Looking into the definition of "dual-icon" to make the Hero icon into a reminder than an actual icon...

Would this mean in the future certain cards like The Roman jailer , King of Nineveh will no longer be considered dual icon cards???

 For cards like Covenant of Eden that "negate other dual icon cards"??



 For deck building requirements for type 2 I guess the legacy rare Naaman would be considered a "Neutral card".

Guess we now have an evil card Naaman (tin sets) and a Neutral card Naaman (legacy rare) for type 2 deck building purposes.

I’m pretty sure both Naamans are evil for T2 deck building purposes.

Just a reminder to everyone that the PoC related cards (ph 1 and 2 and LRs) are being updated on the original PoC spoiler page if you want to see a list of the most recent spoiled cards.

http://www.cactusforums.com/card-information/prophecies-of-christ-(spoiler-thread)/msg589494/#msg589494

Just in case those with the ability to fix it are unaware, the commons on that page are not updated (and several of them changed between the first reveal and the final release).

I'm very excited about this classic card getting brand new art that looks amazing!

Spoiler (hover to show)

Seems like a variety of brigades.

With a good amount of Daniel support, I have to expect a Great Image for crimson. Possibly the Daniel Gabriel or Michael for silver?

Cool. Looking forward to it.